Where does Computational Systems, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Computational Systems, Inc. ranks #5,924 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Computational Systems, Inc. hold?

Computational Systems, Inc. holds 57 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 22 technology areas.

What is Computational Systems, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Computational Systems, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 44.3 out of 100 (top 26% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Computational Systems, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Computational Systems, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Computational Systems, Inc.'s patents?

Computational Systems, Inc.'s patents average 15.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Computational Systems, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Computational Systems, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Computational Systems, Inc. focus on?

Computational Systems, Inc.'s top technology area is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 27 patents, ranking #34 of 1,420 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 22 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 57 granted patents across 22 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Computational ranks #5,924 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 57 patents across 22 technology areas.

#5,924
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 26%
by Innovation Score (44.3/100): 15.7
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5924 · US Corporation #5,924 · 57 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 57 grants
UPPER-Q #5,924/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cardio Flow
CPC-FOCUS G01M · 22 areas
INNOV-PAR 44.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cardio Flow, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Computational’s 44.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.0 pts (32%) Velocity 4.3 pts (10%) Breadth 16.6 pts (37%) Claim depth 9.4 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Computational Systems · this assignee

44
Fluence Bioengineering · near

44
Garland Industries · near

44
H J Heinz Brands · near

44
Heathco · near

44
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Computational's Innovation Score is 44.3/100 (top 26% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Computational?

Each dot is one of Computational’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Computational’s own 15.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Computational vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Computational's grants concentrate

Computational Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 22 CPC subclasses with 47.4% of grants classified under G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Computational sits between Cardio Flow, Inc. and Daikin Europe N.V..

Computational's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Computational Systems, Inc. moved from 28 to 18 grants (0.64x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Cardio Flow

57
Ceva Sante Animale

57
Championx USA

57
Clearfield

57
Cornelius

57
D B Industries

57
Daewoong Pharmace…

57
Daikin Europe

57
Computational Sys… ◀

57

What this shows Computational holds 57 patents at rank #5,925, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Computational

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,925 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Computational's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Computational, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures), Computational ranks #34 of 1,420 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (44 here).

Heathco LLC 44 Fluence Bioengineering, Inc. 44 H.J. Heinz Company Brands LLC 44 Garland Industries, Inc. 44

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (15.7 here).

MGI Tech Co., Ltd. 15.7 avg Kamstrup A/S 15.7 avg Aledia 15.7 avg Lanxess Deutschland GmbH 15.7 avg

Computational's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Computational Systems, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	1.8%
2016	2	3.5%
2017	5	8.8%
2018	2	3.5%
2019	14	24.6%
2020	9	15.8%
2021	5	8.8%
2022	11	19.3%
2023	4	7.0%
2024	3	5.3%
2025partial year	1	1.8%

Which technologies does Computational Systems, Inc. patent most?

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 27

G01H - Measurement OF Mechanical Vibrations OR Ultrasonic, Sonic OR Infrasonic Waves 25

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 15

G01P - Measuring Linear OR Angular Speed, Acceleration, Deceleration, OR SHOCK; Indicating Presence, Absence, OR Direction, OF Movement 11

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 10

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 10

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 5

G08B - Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems 5

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 4

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

H03K - Pulse Technique 3

G07C - Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 3

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 2

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

Top 15 of 22 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Computational Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Computational Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 47.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01M
Ranked #5,924 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Computational Systems, Inc. against Cardio Flow, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 44.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.