Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Centre ranks #11,595 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 16 technology areas.
- #11,595
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 48th percentile
- by Innovation Score (34.6/100)
- 13.3
- avg claims per patent
- -29%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R11595 · Foreign Corporation #11,595 · 26 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 26 grants
- UPPER-Q #11,595/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Caroma Industries
- CPC-FOCUS C12Q · 16 areas
- INNOV-THIN 34.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -29% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Caroma Industries Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Centre’s 34.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Centre
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rayence · near
Rayence · near
35 score
- AMS Research · near
AMS Research · near
35 score
- Centre for Addiction… · this assignee
Centre for Addiction… · this assignee
35 score
- Hexcel Reinforcements · near
Hexcel Reinforcements · near
35 score
- Itoh Denki · near
Itoh Denki · near
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Centre's Innovation Score is 34.6/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Centre?
Each dot is one of Centre’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Centre’s own 13.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Centre's grants concentrate
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 53.8% of grants classified under C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Centre sits between Caroma Industries Limited and China University of Petroleum.
Centre's three-year grant acceleration
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Centre's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Caroma Industries
Caroma Industries Limited
26 patents
- Caterpillar Under…
Caterpillar Underground Mining Pty Ltd.
26 patents
- Centre Firearms
Centre Firearms Co., Inc.
26 patents
- Centre Luxembourg…
Centre Luxembourgeois de Recherches pour le Verre et la Ceramique S.A. (C.R.V.C.)
26 patents
- Chan Li Machinery
Chan Li Machinery Co., Ltd.
26 patents
- Chart Energy & Ch…
Chart Energy & Chemicals, Inc.
26 patents
- China Jiliang Uni…
China Jiliang University
26 patents
- China University…
China University of Petroleum
26 patents
- Centre for Addict… ◀
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
26 patents
What this shows Centre holds 26 patents at rank #11,600, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Centre
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,600 in granted patent volume.
- Caroma Industries Limited #11,596 · 26 patents
- Caterpillar Underground Mining Pty Ltd. #11,597 · 26 patents
- Centre Firearms Co., Inc. #11,598 · 26 patents
- Centre Luxembourgeois de Recherches pour le Verre et la Ceramique S.A. (C.R.V.C.) #11,599 · 26 patents
- Chan Li Machinery Co., Ltd. #11,601 · 26 patents
- Chart Energy & Chemicals, Inc. #11,602 · 26 patents
- China Jiliang University #11,603 · 26 patents
- China University of Petroleum #11,604 · 26 patents
Leaders in C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Centre's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 581 in class
- Life Technologies Corporation 546 in class
- Illumina, Inc. 445 in class
- President and Fellows of Harvard College 387 in class
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH 286 in class
- 10x Genomics, Inc. 282 in class
- The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University 266 in class
- Pacific Biosciences OF California, Inc. 259 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Centre, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes), Centre ranks #332 of 2,502 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (35 here).
Centre's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2017 | 5 | 19.2% |
| 2018 | 1 | 3.8% |
| 2019 | 4 | 15.4% |
| 2020 | 6 | 23.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does Centre for Addiction and Mental Health patent most?
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health's lead technology class is C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr), 53.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C12Q
- Ranked #11,595 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Centre for Addiction and Mental Health against Caroma Industries Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 34.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.