Where does cortical.io AG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), cortical.io AG ranks #39,626 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does cortical.io AG hold?

cortical.io AG holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2023, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is cortical.io AG's Innovation Score?

cortical.io AG has an Innovation Score of 21.8 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does cortical.io AG focus on?

cortical.io AG's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 6 patents, ranking #5,405 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

Is cortical.io AG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

cortical.io AG's recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for cortical.io AG's patents?

cortical.io AG's patents average 8.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the cortical.io AG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

cortical.io AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, cortical.io ranks #39,626 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.

#39,626
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.8/100): 8.2
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39626 · Foreign Corporation #39,626 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,626/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH asphericon
CPC-NARROW G06F · 1 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
CLAIMS-PAR 8.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: asphericon GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How cortical.io’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (31%) Velocity 6.7 pts (31%) Breadth 3.5 pts (16%) Claim depth 4.9 pts (22%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Casio Keisanki · near

22
ViskoTeepak Belgium · near

22
cortical io · this assignee

22
Nitta Haas · near

22
Acute Innovations · near

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows cortical.io's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for cortical.io?

Each dot is one of cortical.io’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). cortical.io’s own 8.2 claims/patent is at or below the 18.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

cortical.io vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where cortical.io's grants concentrate

cortical.io AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, cortical.io sits between Zuca, Inc. and eBots Inc..

cortical.io's three-year grant acceleration

cortical.io AG shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Zuca

6
]Koninklije Phili…

6
asphericon

6
barnesandnoble com

6
dbest products

6
doppler E Doppler…

6
e-numerate Soluti…

6
ebots

6
cortical io ◀

6

What this shows cortical.io holds 6 patents at rank #44,243, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near corticalio

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,243 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in corticalio's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for corticalio, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), corticalio ranks #5,405 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (22 here).

ViskoTeepak Belgium NV 22 Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 22 Nitta Haas Inc. 22 Acute Innovations LLC 22

cortical.io's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

cortical.io AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	16.7%
2020	1	16.7%
2021	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	2	33.3%

Which technologies does cortical.io AG patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

cortical.io AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

cortical.io AG's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #39,626 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare cortical.io AG against Zuca, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.