Where does Comadur SA rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Comadur SA ranks #7,544 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Comadur SA hold?

Comadur SA holds 43 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 42 technology areas.

What is Comadur SA's Innovation Score?

Comadur SA has an Innovation Score of 64.0 out of 100 (top 2% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Comadur SA's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Comadur SA's recent grant velocity is +136% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Comadur SA's patents?

Comadur SA's patents average 13.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Comadur SA patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Comadur SA

Q: What technology areas does Comadur SA focus on?

Comadur SA's top technology area is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars) with 27 patents, ranking #11 of 92 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 42 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 43 granted patents across 42 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Comadur ranks #7,544 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 43 patents across 42 technology areas.

#7,544
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 2%
by Innovation Score (64.0/100): 13.3
avg claims per patent: +136%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7544 · Foreign Corporation #7,544 · 43 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 43 grants
UPPER-Q #7,544/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Carbonite
CPC-WIDE G04B · 42 areas
INNOV-STRONG 64.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +136% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Carbonite, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Comadur’s 64.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.1 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (31%) Breadth 22.9 pts (36%) Claim depth 8.0 pts (13%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cardiac Pacemakers · near

64
Dana Motion Systems… · near

64
Comadur · this assignee

64
Royal Bank of Canada · near

64
Kyocera SLD Laser · near

64
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Comadur's Innovation Score is 64.0/100 (top 2% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Comadur?

Each dot is one of Comadur’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Comadur’s own 13.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Comadur vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Comadur's grants concentrate

Comadur SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 42 CPC subclasses with 62.8% of grants classified under G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Comadur sits between Carbonite, Inc. and Docter Optics SE.

Comadur's three-year grant acceleration

Comadur SA shows 20 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Carbonite

43
Carl Zeiss Jena

43
China University…

43
Chongqing Univers…

43
Coriant Oy

43
Daiwa Kasei Kogyo

43
Dewertokin Techno…

43
Docter Optics SE

43
Comadur ◀

43

What this shows Comadur holds 43 patents at rank #7,544, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Comadur

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,544 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Comadur's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Comadur, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches), Comadur ranks #11 of 92 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (64 here).

Royal Bank of Canada 64 Dana Motion Systems Italia S.R.L. 64 Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. 64 Kyocera SLD Laser, Inc. 64

Comadur's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

64 Top 2% higher than 98% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Comadur SA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	2.3%
2016	5	11.6%
2017	1	2.3%
2018	4	9.3%
2020	2	4.7%
2021	4	9.3%
2022	6	14.0%
2023	7	16.3%
2024	7	16.3%
2025partial year	6	14.0%

Which technologies does Comadur SA patent most?

G04B - Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars 27

G04D - Apparatus OR Tools Specially Designed FOR Making OR Maintaining Clocks OR Watches 17

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 15

A44C - Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins 12

B28B - Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster 9

B22F - Working Metallic POWDER; Manufacture OF Articles From Metallic POWDER; Making Metallic Powder ; Apparatus OR Devices Specially Adapted FOR Metallic Powder 6

B24B - Machines, Devices, OR Processes FOR Grinding OR Polishing ; Dressing OR Conditioning OF Abrading SURFACES; Feeding OF Grinding, Polishing, OR Lapping Agents 5

B23K - Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam 4

B44C - Producing Decorative Effects ; MOSAICS; Tarsia Work ; Paperhanging 4

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 3

C22C - Alloys 3

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 3

C03C - Chemical Composition OF Glasses, Glazes OR Vitreous ENAMELS; Surface Treatment OF GLASS; Surface Treatment OF Fibres OR Filaments Made From Glass, Minerals OR SLAGS; Joining Glass TO Glass OR Other Materials 3

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 3

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 2

Top 15 of 42 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Comadur SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Comadur SA's lead technology class is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars), 62.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G04B
Ranked #7,544 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Comadur SA against Carbonite, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 64.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.