Camp S.p.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Camp ranks #39,302 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #39,302
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.6/100)
- 6.7
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39302 · Foreign Corporation #39,302 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,302/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Calmark Sweden AB
- CPC-NARROW A63B · 5 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Calmark Sweden AB (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Camp’s 18.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Camp
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Camp S p A · this assignee 19
Camp S p A · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Camp's Innovation Score is 18.6/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Camp?
Each dot is one of Camp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Camp’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 14.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Camp's grants concentrate
Camp S.p.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). By volume, Camp sits between Calmark Sweden AB and Candy House Inc..
Who files at Camp's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Calmark Sweden AB
Calmark Sweden AB
6 patents
- Cama1 S P A
Cama1 S.P.A.
6 patents
- Cammenga
Cammenga Company, LLC
6 patents
- Camozzi Automatio…
Camozzi Automation S.P.A.
6 patents
- Canaan Bright Sig…
Canaan Bright Sight Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Canberra Industri…
Canberra Industries, Inc.
6 patents
- Cancer Targeted T…
Cancer Targeted Technology LLC
6 patents
- Candy House
Candy House Inc.
6 patents
- Camp S p A ◀
Camp S.p.A.
6 patents
What this shows Camp holds 6 patents at rank #39,300, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Camp
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,300 in granted patent volume.
- Calmark Sweden AB #39,296 · 6 patents
- Cama1 S.P.A. #39,297 · 6 patents
- Cammenga Company, LLC #39,298 · 6 patents
- Camozzi Automation S.P.A. #39,299 · 6 patents
- Canaan Bright Sight Co., Ltd #39,301 · 6 patents
- Canberra Industries, Inc. #39,302 · 6 patents
- Cancer Targeted Technology LLC #39,303 · 6 patents
- Candy House Inc. #39,304 · 6 patents
Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Camp's primary technology class.
- Acushnet Company 1,084 in class
- Nike, Inc. 843 in class
- Karsten Manufacturing Corporation 819 in class
- Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. 512 in class
- Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. 436 in class
- Callaway Golf Company 398 in class
- Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. 301 in class
- Parsons Xtreme Golf, LLC 264 in class
Camp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Camp S.p.A. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Camp S.p.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Camp S.p.A.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
- Ranked #39,302 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Camp S.p.A. against Calmark Sweden AB, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.