Candy House Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Candy ranks #39,310 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #39,310
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 30th percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.2/100)
- 13.2
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39310 · US Corporation #39,310 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,310/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Camp S p A
- CPC-NARROW E05B · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Camp S.p.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Candy’s 29.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Candy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Candy House · this assignee 29
Candy House · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Candy's Innovation Score is 29.2/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Candy?
Each dot is one of Candy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Candy’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Candy's grants concentrate
Candy House Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Candy sits between Camp S.p.A. and Carbon Energy Inc..
Candy's three-year grant acceleration
Candy House Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Candy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Camp S p A
Camp S.p.A.
6 patents
- Canaan Bright Sig…
Canaan Bright Sight Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Canberra Industri…
Canberra Industries, Inc.
6 patents
- Cancer Targeted T…
Cancer Targeted Technology LLC
6 patents
- Canimguide Therap…
Canimguide Therapeutics AB
6 patents
- Carbon AIR
Carbon AIR Limited
6 patents
- Carbon Clean Solu…
Carbon Clean Solutions Limited
6 patents
- Carbon Energy
Carbon Energy Inc.
6 patents
- Candy House ◀
Candy House Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Candy holds 6 patents at rank #39,304, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Candy
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,304 in granted patent volume.
- Camp S.p.A. #39,300 · 6 patents
- Canaan Bright Sight Co., Ltd #39,301 · 6 patents
- Canberra Industries, Inc. #39,302 · 6 patents
- Cancer Targeted Technology LLC #39,303 · 6 patents
- Canimguide Therapeutics AB #39,305 · 6 patents
- Carbon AIR Limited #39,306 · 6 patents
- Carbon Clean Solutions Limited #39,307 · 6 patents
- Carbon Energy Inc. #39,308 · 6 patents
Leaders in E05B (Locks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Candy's primary technology class.
Candy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Candy House Inc. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Candy House Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Candy House Inc.'s lead technology class is E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05B
- Ranked #39,310 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Candy House Inc. against Camp S.p.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.