Where does Cambridge Electronics, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cambridge Electronics, Inc. ranks #28,326 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cambridge Electronics, Inc. hold?

Cambridge Electronics, Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2022, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Cambridge Electronics, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 30.7 out of 100 (35th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cambridge Electronics, Inc. focus on?

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s top technology area is H10D (Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices) with 9 patents, ranking #440 of 1,402 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -71% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s patents?

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s patents average 16.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cambridge Electronics, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10D (Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cambridge ranks #28,326 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.

#28,326
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.7/100): 16.6
avg claims per patent: -71%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28326 · US Corporation #28,326 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #28,326/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cadenza Innovation
CPC-NARROW H10D · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -71% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cadenza Innovation, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cambridge’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (26%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 6.1 pts (20%) Claim depth 9.9 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cambridge · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cambridge's Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cambridge?

Each dot is one of Cambridge’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cambridge’s own 16.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Cambridge vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cambridge's grants concentrate

Cambridge Electronics, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H10D (Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Cambridge sits between Cadenza Innovation, Inc. and Cardiosolutions, Inc..

Cambridge's three-year grant acceleration

Cambridge Electronics, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Cadenza Innovation

9
Caelus

9
Calcean Minerals…

9
Caliway Biopharma…

9
Canonical

9
Cantex

9
Carbofix Orthoped…

9
Cardiosolutions

9
Cambridge ◀

9

What this shows Cambridge holds 9 patents at rank #28,420, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cambridge

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,420 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10D (Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambridge's primary technology class.

Cambridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cambridge Electronics, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	22.2%
2017	3	33.3%
2018	2	22.2%
2020	1	11.1%
2022	1	11.1%

Which technologies does Cambridge Electronics, Inc. patent most?

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 9

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 2

H03K - Pulse Technique 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cambridge Electronics, Inc.'s lead technology class is H10D (Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10D
Ranked #28,326 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cambridge Electronics, Inc. against Cadenza Innovation, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.