Overall rank by patents
#45,720
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, active 2019–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C02F (TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE).
The verdict
Cambi holds 5 US patents across 11 technology areas, rank #45,720 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cambi Technology AS has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2019 and 2024, placing Cambi Technology AS at rank #45,720 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 11 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in C02F (TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE). As a Foreign Corporation, Cambi Technology AS is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cambi sits between Calcivis Limited (5 patents, rank #45,716) and Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited (5 patents, rank #45,724) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cambi Technology AS's 14.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 11 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cambi Technology AS against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Calcivis Limited
5 patents
Caliber Therapeutics, LLC
5 patents
Calibo LLC
5 patents
Calico Life Sciences LLC
5 patents
Cambridge Engineering, Inc.
5 patents
Cambridge Epigenetix Limited
5 patents
Cambridge Medical Technologies LLC
5 patents
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited
5 patents
Cambi Technology AS
5 patents
What this shows Cambi holds 5 patents at rank #45,720, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,720 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambi's primary technology class.
Cambi's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#45,720
Across all tracked assignees
30.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cambi's 5 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.