PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2021–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
5
Total patents granted
4
CPC technology areas
21.0
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Cambridge holds 5 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #45,724 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#45,724
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 48%
by Innovation Score (35.9/100)
21.0
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2021 and 2022, placing Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited at rank #45,724 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a Foreign Corporation, Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cambridge sits between Cambi Technology AS (5 patents, rank #45,720) and Canwell Biotech Limited (5 patents, rank #45,728) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2022, with 5 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's 21.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Cambridge's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cambridge holds 5 patents at rank #45,724, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cambridge

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,724 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital DATA Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambridge's primary technology class.

Cambridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.5 20212022 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2021 2 40.0%
2022 3 60.0%

Which technologies does Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Specialized
Claim Depth Complex

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#45,724

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

35.9 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited hold?
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited holds 5 US granted patents filed between 2021 and 2022, spanning 4 technology areas.
What is Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's Innovation Score?
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited has an Innovation Score of 35.9 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited focus on?
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's top technology area is G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 4 CPC subclasses total.
Is Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited.
What does claim depth mean for Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's patents?
Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited's patents average 21.0 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Cambridge's 5 grants land it in the top 48% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Cambridge ranks #45,724 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in G06F - see who else leads that technology area. G06F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.