Where does Braskem America, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Braskem America, Inc. ranks #5,570 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Braskem America, Inc. hold?

Braskem America, Inc. holds 61 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 30 technology areas.

What is Braskem America, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Braskem America, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 50.3 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Braskem America, Inc. focus on?

Braskem America, Inc.'s top technology area is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds) with 30 patents, ranking #104 of 1,231 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 30 CPC subclasses total.

Is Braskem America, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Braskem America, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +221% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Braskem America, Inc.'s patents?

Braskem America, Inc.'s patents average 17.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Braskem America, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Braskem America, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 61 granted patents across 30 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Braskem ranks #5,570 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 61 patents across 30 technology areas.

#5,570
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.3/100): 17.9
avg claims per patent: +221%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5570 · US Corporation #5,570 · 61 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 61 grants
UPPER-Q #5,570/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Accelink
CPC-FOCUS C08F · 30 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +221% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Braskem’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.3 pts (28%) Velocity 5.9 pts (12%) Breadth 19.4 pts (38%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Braskem America · this assignee

50
Kobayashi Pharmaceut… · near

50
Mapper Lithography… · near

50
NKT Photonics A/S · near

50
Single Buoy Moorings · near

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Braskem's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Braskem?

Each dot is one of Braskem’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Braskem’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Braskem vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Braskem's grants concentrate

Braskem America, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 30 CPC subclasses with 49.2% of grants classified under C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (12 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Braskem sits between Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. and CLO Virtual Fashion Inc..

Braskem's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Braskem America, Inc. moved from 27 to 24 grants (0.89x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Accelink

61
Airbus DS

61
Alivecor

61
Beijing Kuangshi…

61
Beijing Founder

61
Brooks Automation…

61
Canon Finetech

61
CLO Virtual Fashi…

61
Braskem America ◀

61

What this shows Braskem holds 61 patents at rank #5,569, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Braskem

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,569 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Braskem's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Braskem, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…), Braskem ranks #104 of 1,231 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Single Buoy Moorings Inc. 50 Mapper Lithography IP B.V. 50 NKT Photonics A/S 50 Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 50

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (17.9 here).

THE UAB Research Foundation 17.9 avg Magna Closures Inc. 17.9 avg Business Objects Software Ltd. 17.9 avg Express Scripts Strategic Development, Inc. 17.9 avg

Braskem's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Braskem America, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	4.9%
2016	1	1.6%
2017	1	1.6%
2018	3	4.9%
2019	6	9.8%
2020	9	14.8%
2021	12	19.7%
2022	6	9.8%
2023	9	14.8%
2024	9	14.8%
2025partial year	2	3.3%

Which technologies does Braskem America, Inc. patent most?

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 30

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 28

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 19

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 14

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 13

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 10

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 10

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 7

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 7

D01F - Chemical Features IN THE Manufacture OF Artificial Filaments, Threads, Fibres, Bristles OR RIBBONS; Apparatus Specially Adapted FOR THE Manufacture OF Carbon Filaments 6

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 6

D07B - Ropes OR Cables IN General 5

D10B - Indexing Scheme Associated With Sublasses OF Section D, Relating TO Textiles 5

D01D - Mechanical Methods OR Apparatus IN THE Manufacture OF Artificial Filaments, Threads, Fibres, Bristles OR Ribbons 5

D06B - Treating Textile Materials Using Liquids, Gases OR Vapours 5

Top 15 of 30 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Braskem America, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Braskem America, Inc.'s lead technology class is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds), 49.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08F
Ranked #5,570 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Braskem America, Inc. against Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.