USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Boulder Wind Power, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Boulder ranks #22,306 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 7 technology areas.

#22,306
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.7/100)
17.5
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22306 · US Corporation #22,306 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #22,306/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Bohle
  • CPC-NARROW H02K · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 28.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bohle AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Boulder’s 28.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Boulder

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Boulder's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Boulder?

Each dot is one of Boulder’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Boulder’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 4.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Boulder vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Bohle AG - 12, 4.42BohleBold Limited - 12, 12.42BoldBonutti Skeletal innovations LLC - 12, 24.42Bonutti Skeletal…Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority - 12, 1Botanic Gardens a…Brabantia Nederland B.V. - 12, 1Brabantia Nederla…BrainLit AB - 12, 14.42Brainlit ABBrainium Studios LLC - 12, 1Brainium StudiosBrandt Industries Inc. - 12, 17.58Brandt IndustriesBoulder Wind Power, Inc. - 12, 17.5Boulder Wind Power
Boulder vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Boulder's grants concentrate

Boulder Wind Power, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Boulder sits between Bohle AG and Brandt Industries Inc..

Who files at Boulder's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Boulder holds 12 patents at rank #22,315, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Boulder

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,315 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Boulder's primary technology class.

Boulder's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20152016201720182019 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Boulder Wind Power, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 16.7%
2016 2 16.7%
2017 2 16.7%
2018 1 8.3%
2019 5 41.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Boulder Wind Power, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Boulder Wind Power, Inc.'s lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
  • Ranked #22,306 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Boulder Wind Power, Inc. against Bohle AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.