Where does Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority ranks #22,304 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority hold?

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's Innovation Score?

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority has an Innovation Score of 29.5 out of 100 (31st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority focus on?

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's patents?

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Botanic ranks #22,304 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 0 technology areas.

#22,304
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 31st percentile
by Innovation Score (29.5/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22304 · Foreign Corporation #22,304 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #22,304/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Bodygram
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-THIN 29.5/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bodygram, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Botanic’s 29.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (30%) Velocity 20.0 pts (68%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (2%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Botanic Gardens and… · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Botanic's Innovation Score is 29.5/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Botanic?

Each dot is one of Botanic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Botanic’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Botanic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Botanic's grants concentrate

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2022 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Botanic sits between Bodygram, Inc. and Brainium Studios LLC.

Botanic's three-year grant acceleration

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Bodygram

12
Bohle

12
Bold

12
Bonutti Skeletal…

12
Boulder Wind Power

12
Brabantia Nederla…

12
Brainlit AB

12
Brainium Studios

12
Botanic Gardens a… ◀

12

What this shows Botanic holds 12 patents at rank #22,314, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Botanic

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,314 in granted patent volume.

Botanic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	25.0%
2018	1	8.3%
2021	1	8.3%
2022	5	41.7%
2023	2	16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #22,304 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority against Bodygram, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.