USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Brainium Studios LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Brainium ranks #22,310 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 0 technology areas.

#22,310
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
31st percentile
by Innovation Score (29.5/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22310 · US Corporation #22,310 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #22,310/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Botanic Gardens and…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 29.5/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2024 · 3y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Brainium’s 29.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Brainium

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Brainium's Innovation Score is 29.5/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Brainium?

Each dot is one of Brainium’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Brainium’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Brainium vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority - 12, 1Botanic Gardens a…Boulder Wind Power, Inc. - 12, 17.5Boulder Wind PowerBrabantia Nederland B.V. - 12, 1Brabantia Nederla…BrainLit AB - 12, 14.42Brainlit ABBrandt Industries Inc. - 12, 17.58Brandt IndustriesBreker Verification Systems - 12, 22.5Breker Verificati…Bright Acceleration Technologies LLC - 12, 19.08Bright Accelerati…Brushtech, Inc. - 12, 5.67BrushtechBrainium Studios LLC - 12, 1Brainium Studios
Brainium vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Brainium's grants concentrate

Brainium Studios LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2023 (8 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Brainium sits between Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority and Brushtech, Inc..

Brainium's three-year grant acceleration

Brainium Studios LLC shows 12 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Brainium's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Brainium holds 12 patents at rank #22,318, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Brainium

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,318 in granted patent volume.

Brainium's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 202220232024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Brainium Studios LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 2 16.7%
2023 8 66.7%
2024 2 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Brainium Studios LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #22,310 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Brainium Studios LLC against Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.