Where does Blue Cube IP LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Blue Cube IP LLC ranks #4,412 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Blue Cube IP LLC hold?

Blue Cube IP LLC holds 80 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 38 technology areas.

What is Blue Cube IP LLC's Innovation Score?

Blue Cube IP LLC has an Innovation Score of 47.5 out of 100 (top 18% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Blue Cube IP LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Blue Cube IP LLC's recent grant velocity is -89% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Blue Cube IP LLC's patents?

Blue Cube IP LLC's patents average 14.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Blue Cube IP LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Blue Cube IP LLC

Q: What technology areas does Blue Cube IP LLC focus on?

Blue Cube IP LLC's top technology area is C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds) with 46 patents, ranking #93 of 1,741 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 38 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 80 granted patents across 38 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Blue ranks #4,412 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 80 patents across 38 technology areas.

#4,412
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 18%
by Innovation Score (47.5/100): 14.5
avg claims per patent: -89%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4412 · US Corporation #4,412 · 80 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 80 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,412/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH 100% Speedlab
CPC-FOCUS C08G · 38 areas
INNOV-PAR 47.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -89% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: 100% Speedlab, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Blue’s 47.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.2 pts (32%) Velocity 1.8 pts (4%) Breadth 21.8 pts (46%) Claim depth 8.7 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Blue Cube IP · this assignee

48
Chromalloy Gas Turbine · near

48
Karl Storz & KG · near

48
L E A F Holdings Group · near

48
Reynolds Consumer… · near

48
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Blue's Innovation Score is 47.5/100 (top 18% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Blue?

Each dot is one of Blue’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Blue’s own 14.5 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Blue vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Blue's grants concentrate

Blue Cube IP LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 38 CPC subclasses with 57.5% of grants classified under C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (34 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Blue sits between ZF Passive Safety Systems, US Inc. and Coherent, Inc..

Blue's three-year grant acceleration

Blue Cube IP LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

ZF Passive Safety…

81
e-vision Smart Op…

81
100% Speedlab

80
Avnera

80
Bayer Materialsci…

80
Callahan Cellular…

80
Capital One Finan…

80
Coherent

80
Blue Cube IP ◀

80

What this shows Blue holds 80 patents at rank #4,411, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Blue

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,411 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY React…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Blue's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Blue, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY React…), Blue ranks #93 of 1,741 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (48 here).

L.E.A.F. Holdings Group LLC 48 Reynolds Consumer Products LLC 48 Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG 48 Chromalloy Gas Turbine LLC 48

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (14.5 here).

PTC Therapeutics, Inc. 14.5 avg Apollo Intelligent Driving Technology (BEIJING) Co., Ltd. 14.5 avg Radiant Opto-Electronics Corporation 14.5 avg Ansaldo Energia IP UK Limited 14.5 avg

Blue's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 18% higher than 82% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Blue Cube IP LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	9	11.3%
2016	34	42.5%
2017	20	25.0%
2018	2	2.5%
2019	6	7.5%
2020	1	1.3%
2021	4	5.0%
2022	2	2.5%
2023	1	1.3%
2025partial year	1	1.3%

Which technologies does Blue Cube IP LLC patent most?

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 46

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 31

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 25

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 21

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 10

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 9

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 8

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 7

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 6

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 5

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 4

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

C07F - Acyclic, Carbocyclic OR Heterocyclic Compounds Containing Elements Other Than Carbon, Hydrogen, Halogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Sulfur, Selenium OR Tellurium 3

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 3

C25B - Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Processes FOR THE Production OF Compounds OR NON-METALS; Apparatus Therefor 3

Top 15 of 38 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Blue Cube IP LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Blue Cube IP LLC's lead technology class is C08G (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds), 57.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08G
Ranked #4,412 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Blue Cube IP LLC against ZF Passive Safety Systems, US Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 47.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.