PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Betterguards Technology GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Betterguards ranks #34,457 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.

#34,457
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
32nd percentile
by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
16.3
avg claims per patent
+300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34457 · Foreign Corporation #34,457 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #34,457/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Besst
  • CPC-NARROW A61F · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +300% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Besst, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Betterguards

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Betterguards's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Where Betterguards's grants concentrate

Betterguards Technology GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Betterguards sits between Besst, Inc. and BHS-Sonthofen GmbH.

Betterguards's three-year grant acceleration

Betterguards Technology GmbH shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Betterguards's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Betterguards holds 7 patents at rank #34,425, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Betterguards

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,425 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Betterguards's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Betterguards, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (30 here).

Marina Biotech, Inc. 30 CB Innovations, LLC 30 Zama Japan Kabushiki Kaisha 30 Group Lotus Limited 30

Betterguards's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 20182020202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Betterguards Technology GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 1 14.3%
2020 2 28.6%
2023 1 14.3%
2024 1 14.3%
2025partial year 2 28.6%

Which technologies does Betterguards Technology GmbH patent most?

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#34,457

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

29.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Betterguards Technology GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Betterguards Technology GmbH's lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
  • Ranked #34,457 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Betterguards Technology GmbH against Besst, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.