Overall rank by patents
#842
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 542 granted patents across 80 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Autoliv holds 542 US patents across 80 technology areas, rank #842 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Autoliv Development AB has been granted 542 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Autoliv Development AB at rank #842 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 80 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a Foreign Corporation, Autoliv Development AB is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Autoliv sits between Delta Electronics (shanghai) Co., Ltd. (543 patents, rank #838) and Primax Electronics Ltd. (539 patents, rank #846) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 65.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 325 grants, compared with 217 in the 2015–2019 window, a +50% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Autoliv Development AB's 13.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 80 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Autoliv Development AB against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Delta Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
543 patents
Digimarc Corporation
543 patents
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
543 patents
Xiamen Tianma Micro-Electronics Co., Ltd.
543 patents
Autoliv Development AB
542 patents
FUNAI ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
541 patents
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
541 patents
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
540 patents
PRIMAX ELECTRONICS LTD.
539 patents
What this shows Autoliv holds 542 patents at rank #842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #842 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Autoliv's primary technology class.
Autoliv's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
65 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 38 | 7.0% |
| 2016 | 49 | 9.0% |
| 2017 | 44 | 8.1% |
| 2018 | 36 | 6.6% |
| 2019 | 50 | 9.2% |
| 2020 | 42 | 7.7% |
| 2021 | 39 | 7.2% |
| 2022 | 59 | 10.9% |
| 2023 | 52 | 9.6% |
| 2024 | 84 | 15.5% |
| 2025 | 49 | 9.0% |
Top 15 of 80 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#842
Across all tracked assignees
65.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Autoliv's 542 grants land it in the top 1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.