PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

ATEQ

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60C (VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
23
Total patents granted
19
CPC technology areas
16.6
Avg claims per patent
+300%
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, ATEQ ranks #12,817 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 19 technology areas.

#12,817
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 14%
by Innovation Score (49.7/100)
16.6
avg claims per patent
+300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

ATEQ has been granted 23 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing ATEQ at #12,817 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 19 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60C (VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES). As a Foreign Corporation, ATEQ is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, ATEQ sits between AP Memory Technology Corporation (23 patents, rank #12,792) and Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. (23 patents, rank #12,800) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 49.7/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 16 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +300% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. ATEQ's 16.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 19 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at ATEQ's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows ATEQ holds 23 patents at rank #12,796, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near ATEQ

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,796 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60C (Vehicle Tyres)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ATEQ's primary technology class.

ATEQ's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201520172019202020212022202320242025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
ATEQ patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 4.3%
2017 1 4.3%
2019 2 8.7%
2020 2 8.7%
2021 2 8.7%
2022 3 13.0%
2023 6 26.1%
2024 3 13.0%
2025partial year 3 13.0%

Which technologies does ATEQ patent most?

Top 15 of 19 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 23 grants
CPC subclasses 19
Avg. claims / grant 16.6
Velocity +300%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#12,817

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

49.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does ATEQ rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ATEQ ranks #12,817 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does ATEQ hold?
ATEQ holds 23 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 19 technology areas.
What is ATEQ's Innovation Score?
ATEQ has an Innovation Score of 49.7 out of 100 (top 14% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does ATEQ focus on?
ATEQ's top technology area is B60C (VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES) with 10 patents. Grants appear in 19 CPC subclasses total.
Is ATEQ's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
ATEQ's recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.
What does claim depth mean for ATEQ's patents?
ATEQ's patents average 16.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the ATEQ patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

ATEQ's 23 grants land it in the top 14% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - ATEQ ranks #12,817 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in B60C - see who else leads that technology area. B60C leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.