USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Alderbaran Robotics

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Alderbaran ranks #19,426 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 14 technology areas.

#19,426
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.6/100)
13.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19426 · Foreign Corporation #19,426 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,426/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Aim Management
  • CPC-FOCUS B25J · 14 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 30.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Aim Management, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Alderbaran’s 30.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Alderbaran

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Alderbaran's Innovation Score is 30.6/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Alderbaran?

Each dot is one of Alderbaran’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Alderbaran’s own 13.3 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Alderbaran vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 01020304050 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Aim Management, Inc. - 14, 9.71Aim ManagementAir Liquide Global E&C Solutions Germany GmbH - 14, 15.57Air Liquide Globa…AirFlow Direction, Inc. - 14, 38.64Airflow DirectionAircraft Gear Corporation - 14, 4.14Aircraft GearAlexander Binzel Schweisstechnik GmbH & Co. KG - 14, 4.14Alexander Binzel…Altum View Systems Inc. - 14, 20.93Altum View SystemsAmbature, Inc. - 14, 15.43AmbatureAmeranth, Inc. - 14, 17.43AmeranthAlderbaran Robotics - 14, 13.29Alderbaran Roboti…
Alderbaran vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Alderbaran's grants concentrate

Alderbaran Robotics is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 64.3% of grants classified under B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Alderbaran sits between Aim Management, Inc. and Ameranth, Inc..

Who files at Alderbaran's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Alderbaran holds 14 patents at rank #19,460, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Alderbaran

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,460 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B25J (Manipulators)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Alderbaran's primary technology class.

Alderbaran's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172018 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Alderbaran Robotics patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 28.6%
2016 7 50.0%
2017 2 14.3%
2018 1 7.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Alderbaran Robotics's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Alderbaran Robotics's lead technology class is B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices), 64.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B25J
  • Ranked #19,426 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Alderbaran Robotics against Aim Management, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.