Where does AirFlow Direction, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), AirFlow Direction, Inc. ranks #19,422 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does AirFlow Direction, Inc. hold?

AirFlow Direction, Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

AirFlow Direction, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 52.3 out of 100 (top 10% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does AirFlow Direction, Inc. focus on?

AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s top technology area is G01L (Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure) with 13 patents, ranking #60 of 1,293 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for AirFlow Direction, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s patents?

AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s patents average 38.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the AirFlow Direction, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

AirFlow Direction, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01L (Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Airflow ranks #19,422 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 5 technology areas.

#19,422
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 10%
by Innovation Score (52.3/100): 38.6
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19422 · US Corporation #19,422 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #19,422/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Aeromics
CPC-NARROW G01L · 5 areas
INNOV-PAR 52.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 38.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Aeromics, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Airflow’s 52.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (38%) Breadth 7.9 pts (15%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
AirFlow Direction · this assignee

52
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Airflow's Innovation Score is 52.3/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Airflow?

Each dot is one of Airflow’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Airflow’s own 38.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Airflow vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Airflow's grants concentrate

AirFlow Direction, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 92.9% of grants classified under G01L (Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Airflow sits between Aeromics, Inc. and Altum View Systems Inc..

Airflow's three-year grant acceleration

AirFlow Direction, Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Aeromics

14
Agility Robotics

14
Aim Management

14
Air Liquide Globa…

14
Aircraft Gear

14
Alderbaran Roboti…

14
Alexander Binzel…

14
Altum View Systems

14
Airflow Direction ◀

14

What this shows AirFlow holds 14 patents at rank #19,458, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near AirFlow

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,458 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01L (Measuring Force)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in AirFlow's primary technology class.

Airflow's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

52 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

AirFlow Direction, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	7	50.0%
2023	3	21.4%
2024	1	7.1%
2025partial year	3	21.4%

Which technologies does AirFlow Direction, Inc. patent most?

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 13

G01P - Measuring Linear OR Angular Speed, Acceleration, Deceleration, OR SHOCK; Indicating Presence, Absence, OR Direction, OF Movement 9

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 3

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 1

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

AirFlow Direction, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01L (Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure), 92.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01L
Ranked #19,422 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare AirFlow Direction, Inc. against Aeromics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 52.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.