USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Plansee SE

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 59 granted patents across 45 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B22F (WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER ; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER).

59
Total patents granted
45
CPC technology areas
14.3
Avg claims per patent
-7%
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Plansee ranks #5,786 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 59 patents across 45 technology areas.

#5,786
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.4/100)
14.3
avg claims per patent
-7%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Plansee SE has been granted 59 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Plansee SE at #5,786 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 45 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in B22F (WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER ; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER). As a Foreign Corporation, Plansee SE is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Plansee sits between Orion Corporation (59 patents, rank #5,783) and Revision Military S.a.r.l. (59 patents, rank #5,791) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 50.4/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 28 grants, compared with 30 in the 2015–2019 window, a -7% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Plansee SE's 14.3 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 45 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Plansee's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Plansee holds 59 patents at rank #5,787, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Plansee

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,787 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B22F (Working Metallic Powder)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Plansee's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Plansee, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Plansee's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Plansee SE patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 5.1%
2016 7 11.9%
2017 8 13.6%
2018 5 8.5%
2019 7 11.9%
2020 8 13.6%
2021 7 11.9%
2022 3 5.1%
2023 3 5.1%
2024 7 11.9%
2025partial year 1 1.7%

Which technologies does Plansee SE patent most?

Top 15 of 45 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 59 grants
CPC subclasses 45
Avg. claims / grant 14.3
Velocity -7%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#5,786

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

50.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Plansee SE rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Plansee SE ranks #5,786 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does Plansee SE hold?
Plansee SE holds 59 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 45 technology areas.
What is Plansee SE's Innovation Score?
Plansee SE has an Innovation Score of 50.4 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Plansee SE focus on?
Plansee SE's top technology area is B22F (WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER ; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER) with 25 patents. Grants appear in 45 CPC subclasses total.
Is Plansee SE's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Plansee SE's recent grant velocity is -7% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Plansee SE's patents?
Plansee SE's patents average 14.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the Plansee SE patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Plansee's 59 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Plansee ranks #5,786 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in B22F - see who else leads that technology area. B22F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.