CPC technology class · F26
F26B - Drying Solid Materials OR Objects BY Removing Liquid Ther…
Drying solid materials or objects by removing liquid therefrom. 2,656 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 2,656
- US patents granted
- F26
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +5%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Drying Solid Materials OR Objects BY Removing Liquid Ther… ranks #340 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,656 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 5% over five years.
- #340
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,656
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Lg
- leading assignee (77)
- +5%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass F26B - DRYING SOLID MATERIALS OR OBJECTS BY REMOVING LIQUID THEREFROM - covers 2,656 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class F26 (DRYING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in F26B is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. LG Electronics Inc. leads with 77 patents, followed by Semes Co., Ltd. at 24 grants and USNR, Llc at 19.
Filing activity in F26B is up 5% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is F26B innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in F26B, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 5% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F26B?
The 12 most active assignees in DRYING SOLID MATERIALS OR OBJECTS BY REMOVING LIQUID THEREFROM - wider bars mean more grants
- Screen Holdings
SCREEN HOLDINGS CO., LTD.
29 patents
- Semes
Semes Co., Ltd.
24 patents
- Usnr
USNR, LLC
19 patents
- Velico Medical
Velico Medical Inc.
19 patents
- Revive
Revive Electronics, LLC
17 patents
- Spur Concepts
SPUR CONCEPTS INC
14 patents
- Dyson Technology
Dyson Technology Limited
13 patents
- Eisenmann Se
EISENMANN SE
13 patents
- Gea Process Engineeri…
GEA Process Engineering A/S
13 patents
- Sukup Manufacturing
SUKUP MANUFACTURING CO.
12 patents
- Enwave
EnWave Corporation
12 patents
- Gala Industies 11
Gala Industies, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Lg is the most active filer in F26B, holding 77 of the 2,656 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F26B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Screen Holdings Co., Ltd. | 29 |
| #2 | Semes Co., Ltd. | 24 |
| #3 | USNR, Llc | 19 |
| #4 | Velico Medical Inc. | 19 |
| #5 | Revive Electronics, Llc | 17 |
| #6 | SPUR Concepts Inc | 14 |
| #7 | Dyson Technology Limited | 13 |
| #8 | Eisenmann SE | 13 |
| #9 | GEA Process Engineering A/s | 13 |
| #10 | Sukup Manufacturing Co. | 12 |
| #11 | Enwave Corporation | 12 |
| #12 | Gala Industies, Inc. | 11 |
| #13 | Dürr Systems Ag | 10 |
| #14 | Spraying Systems Co. | 10 |
| #15 | IMA LIFE North America Inc. | 10 |
| #16 | M&R Printing Equipment, Inc. | 9 |
| #17 | Sanofi Pasteur Sa | 9 |
| #18 | Terumo BCT Biotechnologies, Llc | 9 |
| #19 | Ulvac, Inc. | 8 |
| #20 | I.m.a. Industria Macchine Automatiche S.p.a. | 8 |
About This Class
CPC subclass F26B belongs to class F26.
2,656 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F26B assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 F26B assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in F26B. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class F26B?
How many patents have been filed in F26B?
Which company holds the most patents in F26B?
How is patent data for F26B collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.