Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 583 granted patents across 56 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Howmedica ranks #788 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 583 patents across 56 technology areas.
- #788
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 1%
- by Innovation Score (66.0/100)
- 18.1
- avg claims per patent
- +51%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R788 · US Corporation #788 · 583 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 583 grants
- TOP-DECILE #788/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Agilent
- CPC-WIDE A61F · 56 areas
- INNOV-STRONG 66.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +51% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Agilent Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Howmedica’s 66.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Howmedica
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- OmniVision · near
OmniVision · near
66 score
- Varian Medical Systems · near
Varian Medical Systems · near
66 score
- The Trustees of the… · near
The Trustees of the… · near
66 score
- Howmedica Osteonics · this assignee
Howmedica Osteonics · this assignee
66 score
- Schaeffler & KG · near
Schaeffler & KG · near
66 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Howmedica's Innovation Score is 66.0/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Howmedica?
Each dot is one of Howmedica’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Howmedica’s own 18.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
How Howmedica's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. received 309 grants versus 205 in 2015–2019 (+51% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2024 at 88 grants and bottomed in 2016 at 31. Lead class A61F accounts for 67.2% of the portfolio across 56 subclasses. Volume neighbours: North Carolina State University (#784) and University of Central Florida Research Foundation (#792).
Howmedica's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. moved from 162 to 199 grants (1.23x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #741. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Howmedica's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- North Carolina St…
North Carolina State University
585 patents
- Agilent
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
583 patents
- Bayer Cropscience…
Bayer Cropscience Aktiengesellschaft
583 patents
- Children's Medica…
Children's Medical Center Corporation
583 patents
- Howmedica Osteoni… ◀
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
583 patents
- Analog Devices In…
Analog Devices International Unlimited Company
582 patents
- irobot
iRobot Corporation
582 patents
- Coloplast A/S
Coloplast A/S
581 patents
- University of Cen…
University of Central Florida Research Foundation
581 patents
What this shows Howmedica holds 583 patents at rank #788, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Howmedica
By rank, the assignees closest to #788 in granted patent volume.
- North Carolina State University #784 · 585 patents
- Agilent Technologies, Inc. #785 · 583 patents
- Bayer Cropscience Aktiengesellschaft #786 · 583 patents
- Children's Medical Center Corporation #787 · 583 patents
- Analog Devices International Unlimited Company #789 · 582 patents
- iRobot Corporation #790 · 582 patents
- Coloplast A/S #791 · 581 patents
- University of Central Florida Research Foundation #792 · 581 patents
Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Howmedica's primary technology class.
- The Procter & Gamble Company 1,426 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 1,101 in class
- Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 1,101 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 851 in class
- Globus Medical, Inc. 752 in class
- Cook Medical Technologies LLC 700 in class
- Smith & Nephew, Inc. 541 in class
- Covidien LP 528 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Howmedica, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels), Howmedica ranks #14 of 3,082 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (66 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.1 here).
Howmedica's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
66 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 40 | 6.9% |
| 2016 | 31 | 5.3% |
| 2017 | 46 | 7.9% |
| 2018 | 36 | 6.2% |
| 2019 | 52 | 8.9% |
| 2020 | 51 | 8.7% |
| 2021 | 59 | 10.1% |
| 2022 | 58 | 9.9% |
| 2023 | 53 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 88 | 15.1% |
| 2025partial year | 69 | 11.8% |
Which technologies does Howmedica Osteonics Corp. patent most?
Top 15 of 56 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Howmedica Osteonics Corp.'s lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 67.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
- Ranked #788 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Howmedica Osteonics Corp. against North Carolina State University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 66.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.