PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Weka.IO Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 104 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Weka.io ranks #3,554 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 104 patents across 3 technology areas.

#3,554
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.5/100)
23.7
avg claims per patent
+450%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3554 · Foreign Corporation #3,554 · 104 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 104 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #3,554/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sarepta Therapeutics
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 50.5/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 23.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +450% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Weka.io

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Weka.io's Innovation Score is 50.5/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Where Weka.io's grants concentrate

Weka.IO Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (21 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Weka.io sits between Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Celgene Quanticel Research, Inc..

Weka.io's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Weka.IO Ltd. moved from 26 to 55 grants (2.12x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #186. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at WekaIO's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Weka.IO holds 104 patents at rank #3,554, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near WekaIO

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,554 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in WekaIO's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for WekaIO, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

University College Cardiff Consultants Limited 51 Liqui-Box Corporation 51 US Government AS Represented BY THE Secretary OF THE Army 51 Dehn SE 51

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (23.7 here).

HI LLC 23.7 avg Veniam, Inc. 23.7 avg DE LA RUE International Limited 23.7 avg Instart Logic, Inc. 23.7 avg

Weka.io's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 13
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Weka.IO Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 1.0%
2017 6 5.8%
2018 3 2.9%
2019 4 3.8%
2020 3 2.9%
2021 19 18.3%
2022 13 12.5%
2023 21 20.2%
2024 21 20.2%
2025partial year 13 12.5%

Which technologies does Weka.IO Ltd. patent most?

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#3,554

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

50.5 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Weka.IO Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Weka.IO Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #3,554 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Weka.IO Ltd. against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 50.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.