USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Twin Harbor Labs LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Twin ranks #19,292 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 26 technology areas.

#19,292
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 43%
by Innovation Score (37.6/100)
16.7
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19292 · US Corporation #19,292 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,292/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Tubi
  • CPC-FOCUS H04W · 26 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 37.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tubi, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Twin’s 37.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Twin

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Twin's Innovation Score is 37.6/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Twin?

Each dot is one of Twin’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Twin’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Twin vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 14.914.91515.1 8101214161820 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Tubi, Inc. - 15, 18.13TubiTurboden S.p.A. - 15, 14.27Turboden S p ATurfco Mfg., Inc. - 15, 11.8Turfco MfgTurntide Technologies, Inc. - 15, 16.33TurntideTwist-Ease, Inc. - 15, 15.47Twist-easeU.S. Silica Company - 15, 16.2U S SilicaUlife Healthcare Inc. - 15, 9.13Ulife HealthcareUltra Safe Nuclear Corporation - 15, 14.87Ultra Safe NuclearTwin Harbor Labs LLC - 15, 16.73Twin Harbor Labs
Twin vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Twin's grants concentrate

Twin Harbor Labs LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 26 CPC subclasses with 46.7% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Twin sits between Tubi, Inc. and Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation.

Who files at Twin's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Twin holds 15 patents at rank #19,287, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Twin

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,287 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Twin's primary technology class.

Twin's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 20152016201720182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Twin Harbor Labs LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 6.7%
2016 10 66.7%
2017 2 13.3%
2018 1 6.7%
2019 1 6.7%

Which technologies does Twin Harbor Labs LLC patent most?

Top 15 of 26 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Twin Harbor Labs LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Twin Harbor Labs LLC's lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 46.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
  • Ranked #19,292 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Twin Harbor Labs LLC against Tubi, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 37.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.