Twin Harbor Labs LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Twin ranks #19,292 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 26 technology areas.
- #19,292
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 43%
- by Innovation Score (37.6/100)
- 16.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R19292 · US Corporation #19,292 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #19,292/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tubi
- CPC-FOCUS H04W · 26 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tubi, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Twin’s 37.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Twin
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Twin Harbor Labs · this assignee
Twin Harbor Labs · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Twin's Innovation Score is 37.6/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Twin?
Each dot is one of Twin’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Twin’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Twin's grants concentrate
Twin Harbor Labs LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 26 CPC subclasses with 46.7% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Twin sits between Tubi, Inc. and Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation.
Who files at Twin's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tubi
Tubi, Inc.
15 patents
- Turboden S p A
Turboden S.p.A.
15 patents
- Turfco Mfg
Turfco Mfg., Inc.
15 patents
- Turntide
Turntide Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
- Twist-ease
Twist-Ease, Inc.
15 patents
- U S Silica
U.S. Silica Company
15 patents
- Ulife Healthcare
Ulife Healthcare Inc.
15 patents
- Ultra Safe Nuclear
Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation
15 patents
- Twin Harbor Labs ◀
Twin Harbor Labs LLC
15 patents
What this shows Twin holds 15 patents at rank #19,287, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Twin
By rank, the assignees closest to #19,287 in granted patent volume.
- Tubi, Inc. #19,283 · 15 patents
- Turboden S.p.A. #19,284 · 15 patents
- Turfco Mfg., Inc. #19,285 · 15 patents
- Turntide Technologies, Inc. #19,286 · 15 patents
- Twist-Ease, Inc. #19,288 · 15 patents
- U.S. Silica Company #19,289 · 15 patents
- Ulife Healthcare Inc. #19,290 · 15 patents
- Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation #19,291 · 15 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Twin's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
Twin's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2016 | 10 | 66.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does Twin Harbor Labs LLC patent most?
Top 15 of 26 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Twin Harbor Labs LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Twin Harbor Labs LLC's lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 46.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #19,292 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Twin Harbor Labs LLC against Tubi, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.