Where does Tonal Systems, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Tonal Systems, Inc. ranks #3,611 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Tonal Systems, Inc. hold?

Tonal Systems, Inc. holds 102 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 15 technology areas.

What is Tonal Systems, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Tonal Systems, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 58.9 out of 100 (top 4% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Tonal Systems, Inc. focus on?

Tonal Systems, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 88 patents, ranking #16 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 15 CPC subclasses total.

Is Tonal Systems, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Tonal Systems, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +2767% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Tonal Systems, Inc.'s patents?

Tonal Systems, Inc.'s patents average 15.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Tonal Systems, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Tonal Systems, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 102 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Tonal ranks #3,611 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 102 patents across 15 technology areas.

#3,611
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 4%
by Innovation Score (58.9/100): 15.3
avg claims per patent: +2767%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3611 · US Corporation #3,611 · 102 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 102 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,611/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Shanghai Cambricon…
CPC-FOCUS A63B · 15 areas
INNOV-PAR 58.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +2767% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Shanghai Cambricon Information Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Tonal’s 58.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.0 pts (27%) Velocity 20.0 pts (34%) Breadth 13.7 pts (23%) Claim depth 9.2 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Danmarks Tekniske… · near

59
Chung ANG University… · near

59
Hunan University · near

59
Tonal Systems · this assignee

59
ChemImage · near

59
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Tonal's Innovation Score is 58.9/100 (top 4% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tonal?

Each dot is one of Tonal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tonal’s own 15.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Tonal vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Tonal's grants concentrate

Tonal Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 86.3% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (29 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, Tonal sits between Shanghai Cambricon Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Woojin Plastic Co., Ltd..

Tonal's three-year grant acceleration

Tonal Systems, Inc. shows 70 grants in 2022–2024 against only 19 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Shanghai Cambrico…

102
SHL Group AB

102
Sumitomo Dainippo…

102
Super Micro Compu…

102
Technische Univer…

102
VMI Holland B V

102
Veolia Water Solu…

102
Woojin Plastic

102
Tonal Systems ◀

102

What this shows Tonal holds 102 patents at rank #3,610, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Tonal

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,610 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tonal's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Tonal, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Tonal ranks #16 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (59 here).

Chung ANG University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation 59 Hunan University 59 ChemImage Corporation 59 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet 59

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (15.3 here).

Dionex Corporation 15.3 avg Fuzhou BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 15.3 avg TE Connectivity Nederland BV 15.3 avg Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 15.3 avg

Tonal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

59 Top 4% higher than 96% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Tonal Systems, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	2.9%
2020	5	4.9%
2021	11	10.8%
2022	17	16.7%
2023	24	23.5%
2024	29	28.4%
2025partial year	13	12.7%

Which technologies does Tonal Systems, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 88

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 13

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 10

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 9

B66F - Hoisting, Lifting, Hauling OR Pushing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Devices Which Apply A Lifting OR Pushing Force Directly TO THE Surface OF A Load 8

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 7

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 2

G01G - Weighing 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 1

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Tonal Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Tonal Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 86.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #3,611 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Tonal Systems, Inc. against Shanghai Cambricon Information Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 58.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.