Overall rank by patents
#14,317
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 15 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G21F (PROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR).
The verdict
TN holds 21 US patents across 15 technology areas, rank #14,317 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
TN International has been granted 21 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing TN International at rank #14,317 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 15 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in G21F (PROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR). As a Foreign Corporation, TN International is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, TN sits between THE Korea Development BANK (21 patents, rank #14,313) and TOPY Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (21 patents, rank #14,321) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 35.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 17 in the 2015–2019 window, a -76% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. TN International's 14.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 15 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark TN International against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
THE KOREA DEVELOPMENT BANK
21 patents
THINKANALYTICS LTD.
21 patents
TIAMA
21 patents
TMY Technology Inc.
21 patents
TOKUSEN KOGYO CO., LTD.
21 patents
TONGYU COMMUNICATION INC.
21 patents
TONIX PHARMA LIMITED
21 patents
TOPY KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
21 patents
TN INTERNATIONAL
21 patents
What this shows TN holds 21 patents at rank #14,317, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,317 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TN's primary technology class.
TN's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2016 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2018 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2019 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2022 | 2 | 9.5% |
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#14,317
Across all tracked assignees
35.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
TN's 21 grants land it in the top 49% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.