PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 67 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #5,185 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 67 patents across 4 technology areas.

#5,185
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.6/100)
1.9
avg claims per patent
+142%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5185 · Foreign Corporation #5,185 · 67 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 67 grants
  • UPPER-Q #5,185/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sony Interactive…
  • CPC-NARROW B65D · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +142% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 24.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around The

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 24.6/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 1.9 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 66.967.067.06767.067.067.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited - 67, 16.61Sony Interactive…TCL Research America Inc. - 67, 16.91TCL Research Amer…Tibco Software Inc. - 67, 19.21Tibco SoftwareTumi, Inc. - 67, 6.43TumiThe United States of America as Represented by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services - 67, 14.45The United States…Valqua, Ltd. - 67, 3.01ValquaWebroot Inc. - 67, 20.06WebrootWarrior Sports, Inc. - 67, 11.81Warrior SportsThe Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. - 67, 1.93The Decor Pty
The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where The's grants concentrate

The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 6% of grants classified under B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (22 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, The sits between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited and Warrior Sports, Inc..

The's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. moved from 45 to 12 grants (0.27x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at The's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows The holds 67 patents at rank #5,187, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,187 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials), The ranks #942 of 3,365 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (25 here).

Bond Manufacturing Co., Inc. 25 VentiRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 25 Toontrack Music AB 25 THE Conard Pyle Company 25

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.9 here).

Guangdong Bestek E-commerce Co., Ltd. 1.9 avg Shin TAI Spurt Water OF THE Garden Tools Co., Ltd 1.9 avg Gavrieli Brands LLC 1.9 avg Resource Intl Inc. 2.0 avg

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 3.0%
2016 3 4.5%
2017 2 3.0%
2018 1 1.5%
2019 11 16.4%
2020 12 17.9%
2021 22 32.8%
2022 5 7.5%
2023 5 7.5%
2024 2 3.0%
2025partial year 2 3.0%

Which technologies does The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd.'s lead technology class is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F), 6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65D
  • Ranked #5,185 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare The Decor Corporation Pty. Ltd. against Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.