Overall rank by patents
#27,640
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2018–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B62M (RIDER PROPULSION OF WHEELED VEHICLES OR SLEDGES; POWERED PROPULSION OF SLEDGES OR ; SINGLE-TRACK; CYCLES; TRANSMISSIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SUCH VEHICLES).
The verdict
The holds 10 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #27,640 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
The Cycle Group has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing The Cycle Group at rank #27,640 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 8.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B62M (RIDER PROPULSION OF WHEELED VEHICLES OR SLEDGES; POWERED PROPULSION OF SLEDGES OR ; SINGLE-TRACK; CYCLES; TRANSMISSIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SUCH VEHICLES). As a US Corporation, The Cycle Group is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, The sits between The Bartley J. Madden Foundation (10 patents, rank #27,636) and The H.d. Lee Company, Inc. (10 patents, rank #27,644) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 38.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 7 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +133% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. The Cycle Group's 8.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark The Cycle Group against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
The Bartley J. Madden Foundation
10 patents
The Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Nevada
10 patents
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama for and on behalf of the University of Alabama
10 patents
The Chillafish Company N.V.
10 patents
The Davidson Works Co. Ltd
10 patents
The Francis Crick Institute Limited
10 patents
The Giovanni Project LLC
10 patents
The H.D. Lee Company, Inc.
10 patents
The Cycle Group
10 patents
What this shows The holds 10 patents at rank #27,640, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,640 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 4 | 40.0% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#27,640
Across all tracked assignees
38.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
The's 10 grants land it in the top 41% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.