The Chillafish Company N.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #27,612 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #27,612
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 1st percentile
- by Innovation Score (10.0/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27612 · Foreign Corporation #27,612 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,612/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Thales Nederland B V
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 10.0/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Thales Nederland B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How The’s 10.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around The
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- The Chillafish · this assignee 10
The Chillafish · this assignee
10 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows The's Innovation Score is 10.0/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?
Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where The's grants concentrate
The Chillafish Company N.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, The sits between Thales Nederland B.V. and The Giovanni Project LLC.
The's three-year grant acceleration
The Chillafish Company N.V. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at The's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Thales Nederland…
Thales Nederland B.V.
10 patents
- The Bartley J Mad…
The Bartley J. Madden Foundation
10 patents
- The Board of Rege…
The Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Nevada
10 patents
- The Board of Trus…
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama for and on behalf of the University of Alabama
10 patents
- The Cycle Group
The Cycle Group
10 patents
- The Davidson Works
The Davidson Works Co. Ltd
10 patents
- The Francis Crick…
The Francis Crick Institute Limited
10 patents
- The Giovanni Proj…
The Giovanni Project LLC
10 patents
- The Chillafish ◀
The Chillafish Company N.V.
10 patents
What this shows The holds 10 patents at rank #27,639, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near The
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,639 in granted patent volume.
- Thales Nederland B.V. #27,635 · 10 patents
- The Bartley J. Madden Foundation #27,636 · 10 patents
- The Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Nevada #27,637 · 10 patents
- The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama for and on behalf of the University of Alabama #27,638 · 10 patents
- The Cycle Group #27,640 · 10 patents
- The Davidson Works Co. Ltd #27,641 · 10 patents
- The Francis Crick Institute Limited #27,642 · 10 patents
- The Giovanni Project LLC #27,643 · 10 patents
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
10 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
The Chillafish Company N.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #27,612 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare The Chillafish Company N.V. against Thales Nederland B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 10.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.