PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Tennine Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B23D (PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
6
Total patents granted
10
CPC technology areas
9.2
Avg claims per patent
+0%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Tennine holds 6 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #43,642 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#43,642
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 45%
by Innovation Score (36.7/100)
9.2
avg claims per patent
+0%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Tennine Corp. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Tennine Corp. at rank #43,642 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B23D (PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a US Corporation, Tennine Corp. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Tennine sits between Tempest Technology Corporation (6 patents, rank #43,638) and Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. (6 patents, rank #43,646) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Tennine Corp.'s 9.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Tennine Corp. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Tennine's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Tennine holds 6 patents at rank #43,642, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Tennine

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,642 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B23D (Planing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tennine's primary technology class.

Tennine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1 201520162017202220242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Tennine Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 16.7%
2016 1 16.7%
2017 1 16.7%
2022 1 16.7%
2024 1 16.7%
2025 1 16.7%

Which technologies does Tennine Corp. patent most?

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Simple
Velocity Growing

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#43,642

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

36.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Tennine Corp. hold?
Tennine Corp. holds 6 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 10 technology areas.
What is Tennine Corp.'s Innovation Score?
Tennine Corp. has an Innovation Score of 36.7 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Tennine Corp. focus on?
Tennine Corp.'s top technology area is B23D (PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR) with 4 patents. The company has filed patents in 10 CPC subclasses total.
Is Tennine Corp.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Tennine Corp.'s recent filing velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period. The company is maintaining or growing its patent output.
What does claim depth mean for Tennine Corp.'s patents?
Tennine Corp.'s patents average 9.2 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the Tennine Corp. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Tennine's 6 grants land it in the top 45% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Tennine ranks #43,642 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in B23D - see who else leads that technology area. B23D leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.