Overall rank by patents
#43,510
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C12M (Apparatus FOR Enzymology OR MICROBIOLOGY; Apparatus FOR Culturing Microorganisms FOR Producing Biomass, FOR Growing Cells OR FOR Obtaining Fermentation OR Metabolic Products, i.e. Bioreactors OR Ferme).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, TAP ranks #43,510 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43510 · Foreign Corporation #43,510 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tangentix Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
The Marco · near
21 score
TAP Biosystems (PHC) · this assignee
21 score
Singapore Volition PTE · near
21 score
JBL International · near
21 score
Diamond 6S Management · near
21 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows TAP's Innovation Score is 21.1/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
TAP Biosystems (PHC) Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under C12M (Apparatus FOR Enzymology OR MICROBIOLOGY; Apparatus FOR Culturing Microorganisms FOR Producing Biomass, FOR Growing Cells OR FOR Obtaining Fermentation OR Metabolic Products, i.e. Bioreactors OR Ferme). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, TAP sits between Tangentix Limited and Tatung Technology Inc..
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Tangentix Limited
6 patents
Tangi0 Limited
6 patents
Taniobis GMBH
6 patents
Tankbots, Inc.
6 patents
TAP Sound System
6 patents
Targedys
6 patents
Targimmune Therapeutics AG
6 patents
Tatung Technology Inc.
6 patents
TAP Biosystems (PHC) Limited
6 patents
What this shows TAP holds 6 patents at rank #43,469, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,469 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TAP's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for TAP, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (21 here).
TAP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#43,510
of 49,997 tracked assignees
21.1 out of 100
What to do with this data
TAP Biosystems (PHC) Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.