PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

The Marco Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #30,388 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.

#30,388
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.2/100)
10.2
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R30388 · US Corporation #30,388 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #30,388/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH The Flinders…
  • CPC-NARROW A47F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.2/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 10.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: The Flinders University of South Australia (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 21.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around The

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 21.2/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 10.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent The Flinders University of South Australia - 9, 17The Flinders Univ…The Government of the United States of American, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services - 9, 11The Government of…The Intellisis Corporation - 9, 14.67The IntellisisThe Japan Research Institute, Limited - 9, 10.22The Japan Researc…The Monte Vista Group, LLC - 9, 1.44The Monte Vista G…The Nordam Group LLC - 9, 22.22The Nordam GroupThe Neat Company, Inc. - 9, 22.33The NeatThe Oilgear Company - 9, 15.44The OilgearThe Marco Company - 9, 10.22The Marco
The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where The's grants concentrate

The Marco Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, The sits between The Flinders University of South Australia and The Oilgear Company.

Who files at The's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows The holds 9 patents at rank #30,394, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #30,394 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47F (Special Furniture)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A47F (Special Furniture), The ranks #70 of 482 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (21 here).

Exterior Wall Systems Limited 21 Ardagh Metal Beverage USA Inc. 21 TAP Biosystems (PHC) Limited 21 Kiwi Technology Inc. 21

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2015201620172019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
The Marco Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 44.4%
2016 3 33.3%
2017 1 11.1%
2019 1 11.1%

Which technologies does The Marco Company patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Marco Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • The Marco Company's lead technology class is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47F
  • Ranked #30,388 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare The Marco Company against The Flinders University of South Australia, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.