Where does Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation ranks #16,408 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

What is Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's Innovation Score?

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation has an Innovation Score of 34.7 out of 100 (49th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's recent grant velocity is -36% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's patents?

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's patents average 13.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation

Q: How many patents does Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation hold?

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation holds 18 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 12 technology areas.

Q: What technology areas does Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation focus on?

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's top technology area is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines) with 10 patents, ranking #266 of 1,724 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Q: How is the Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Systems ranks #16,408 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 12 technology areas.

#16,408
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 49th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.7/100): 13.1
avg claims per patent: -36%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16408 · US Corporation #16,408 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
MID-PACK #16,408/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Suzhou Littelfuse OVS
CPC-FOCUS H02K · 12 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -36% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Suzhou Littelfuse OVS Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Systems’s 34.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.2 pts (29%) Velocity 4.4 pts (13%) Breadth 12.2 pts (35%) Claim depth 7.9 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Coursera · near

35
Mie Fujitsu… · near

35
Systems Machines… · this assignee

35
Assembleon B V · near

35
Mojix · near

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Systems's Innovation Score is 34.7/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Systems?

Each dot is one of Systems’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Systems’s own 13.1 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Systems vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Systems's grants concentrate

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Systems sits between Suzhou Littelfuse OVS Co., Ltd. and Taiki Corp., Ltd..

Systems's three-year grant acceleration

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Suzhou Littelfuse…

18
Sweetlabs

18
Synvasive Technol…

18
Synvina C V

18
Szent

18
T-central

18
T-H Marine Suppli…

18
Taiki

18
Systems Machines… ◀

18

What this shows Systems holds 18 patents at rank #16,406, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Systems

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,406 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Systems's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Systems, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), Systems ranks #266 of 1,724 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (35 here).

Coursera, Inc. 35 Mie Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited 35 Assembleon B.V. 35 Mojix, Inc. 35

Systems's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	11.1%
2017	4	22.2%
2018	2	11.1%
2019	3	16.7%
2020	3	16.7%
2023	1	5.6%
2024	3	16.7%

Which technologies does Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation patent most?

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 10

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 6

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 5

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 3

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 2

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 1

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 1

B67B - Applying Closure Members TO Bottles Jars, OR Similar CONTAINERS; Opening Closed Containers 1

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 1

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

G01D - Measuring NOT Specially Adapted FOR A Specific VARIABLE; Arrangements FOR Measuring TWO OR More Variables NOT Covered IN A Single Other SUBCLASS; Tariff Metering APPARATUS; Measuring OR Testing NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation's lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
Ranked #16,408 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Systems, Machines, Automation Components Corporation against Suzhou Littelfuse OVS Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.