Overall rank by patents
#6,190
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 55 granted patents across 80 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02J (CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Southern ranks #6,190 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 55 patents across 80 technology areas.
Southern University Of Science And Technology has been granted 55 US utility patents between 2017 and 2025, placing Southern University Of Science And Technology at #6,190 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 80 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 10.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in H02J (CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY). As a Foreign Corporation, Southern University Of Science And Technology is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Southern sits between SDI Technologies, Inc. (55 patents, rank #6,185) and The Jackson Laboratory (55 patents, rank #6,193) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 55.0/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 39 grants, compared with 9 in the 2015–2019 window, a +333% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Southern University Of Science And Technology's 10.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 80 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SDI Technologies, Inc.
55 patents
SHENZHEN VALUELINK E-COMMERCE CO., LTD.
55 patents
SIGMASTAR TECHNOLOGY LTD.
55 patents
Sonitor Technologies AS
55 patents
Stamford Devices Ltd
55 patents
THALES CANADA INC.
55 patents
The 41st Parameter, Inc.
55 patents
The Jackson Laboratory
55 patents
Southern University of Science and Technology
55 patents
What this shows Southern holds 55 patents at rank #6,189, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,189 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Southern's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Southern, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (55 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (10.6 here).
Southern's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
55 Top 7% higher than 93% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 4 | 7.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 3.6% |
| 2019 | 3 | 5.5% |
| 2020 | 6 | 10.9% |
| 2021 | 8 | 14.5% |
| 2022 | 7 | 12.7% |
| 2023 | 13 | 23.6% |
| 2024 | 5 | 9.1% |
| 2025partial year | 7 | 12.7% |
Top 15 of 80 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#6,190
of 50,000 tracked assignees
55.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Southern's 55 grants land it in the top 7% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.