Overall rank by patents
#2,865
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 134 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F41A (FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE).
The verdict
Smith holds 134 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #2,865 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Smith & Wesson Inc. has been granted 134 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Smith & Wesson Inc. at rank #2,865 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F41A (FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE). As a US Corporation, Smith & Wesson Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Smith sits between Ingenico Inc. (134 patents, rank #2,861) and Wayne Fueling Systems Llc (134 patents, rank #2,869) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 68 grants, compared with 66 in the 2015–2019 window, a +3% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Smith & Wesson Inc.'s 13.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Smith & Wesson Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Ingenico Inc.
134 patents
P-TECH CO., LTD.
134 patents
SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
134 patents
SUMIDA CORPORATION
134 patents
TOKYO VISIONARY OPTICS Co., Ltd.
134 patents
UNIVERSITE DE STRASBOURG
134 patents
ViOptix, Inc.
134 patents
Wayne Fueling Systems LLC
134 patents
Smith & Wesson Inc.
134 patents
What this shows Smith holds 134 patents at rank #2,865, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,865 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smith's primary technology class.
Smith's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 46% higher than 54% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 8.2% |
| 2016 | 9 | 6.7% |
| 2017 | 16 | 11.9% |
| 2018 | 17 | 12.7% |
| 2019 | 13 | 9.7% |
| 2020 | 7 | 5.2% |
| 2021 | 23 | 17.2% |
| 2022 | 9 | 6.7% |
| 2023 | 4 | 3.0% |
| 2024 | 15 | 11.2% |
| 2025 | 10 | 7.5% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,865
Across all tracked assignees
36.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Smith's 134 grants land it in the top 46% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.