Overall rank by patents
#1,248
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 339 granted patents across 44 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61M (DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR).
The verdict
Smith holds 339 US patents across 44 technology areas, rank #1,248 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Smith & Nephew Plc has been granted 339 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Smith & Nephew Plc at rank #1,248 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 44 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61M (DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR). As a Foreign Corporation, Smith & Nephew Plc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Smith sits between Parallel Wireless, Inc. (340 patents, rank #1,244) and Gambro Lundia AB (338 patents, rank #1,252) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 63.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 213 grants, compared with 126 in the 2015–2019 window, a +69% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Smith & Nephew Plc's 17.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 44 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Smith & Nephew Plc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Parallel Wireless, Inc.
340 patents
Sonova AG
340 patents
Wirtgen GmbH
340 patents
HP INDIGO B.V.
339 patents
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD.
339 patents
Tektronix, Inc.
339 patents
Smith & Nephew PLC
339 patents
Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
338 patents
GAMBRO LUNDIA AB
338 patents
What this shows Smith holds 339 patents at rank #1,248, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,248 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smith's primary technology class.
Smith's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
63 Top 2% higher than 98% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 22 | 6.5% |
| 2016 | 15 | 4.4% |
| 2017 | 26 | 7.7% |
| 2018 | 36 | 10.6% |
| 2019 | 27 | 8.0% |
| 2020 | 27 | 8.0% |
| 2021 | 39 | 11.5% |
| 2022 | 26 | 7.7% |
| 2023 | 50 | 14.7% |
| 2024 | 50 | 14.7% |
| 2025 | 21 | 6.2% |
Top 15 of 44 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#1,248
Across all tracked assignees
63.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Smith's 339 grants land it in the top 2% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.