Sharp Fluidics Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Sharp ranks #14,261 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #14,261
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 44%
- by Innovation Score (37.3/100)
- 20.9
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14261 · US Corporation #14,261 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #14,261/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Semantic PTY
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Semantic Technologies PTY Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Sharp’s 37.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sharp
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Coopper Tire & Rubber · near
Coopper Tire & Rubber · near
37 score
- De' Longhi Appliance… · near
De' Longhi Appliance… · near
37 score
- Institute OF… · near
Institute OF… · near
37 score
- Sharp Fluidics · this assignee
Sharp Fluidics · this assignee
37 score
- Sunrun South · near
Sunrun South · near
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Sharp's Innovation Score is 37.3/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sharp?
Each dot is one of Sharp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sharp’s own 20.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Sharp's grants concentrate
Sharp Fluidics Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Sharp sits between Semantic Technologies PTY Ltd and Shenzhen FLY Rodent Dynamics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd..
Sharp's three-year grant acceleration
Sharp Fluidics Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Sharp's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Semantic PTY
Semantic Technologies PTY Ltd
21 patents
- Seyond
Seyond, Inc.
21 patents
- SF Diamond
SF Diamond Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Shanghai Easy-use…
Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd
21 patents
- Shawcor
Shawcor Ltd.
21 patents
- Shedrain
Shedrain Corporation
21 patents
- Shenzhen Ennoplus…
Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Shenzhen FLY Rode…
Shenzhen FLY Rodent Dynamics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Sharp Fluidics ◀
Sharp Fluidics Inc.
21 patents
What this shows Sharp holds 21 patents at rank #14,250, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Sharp
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,250 in granted patent volume.
- Semantic Technologies PTY Ltd #14,246 · 21 patents
- Seyond, Inc. #14,247 · 21 patents
- SF Diamond Co., Ltd. #14,248 · 21 patents
- Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd #14,249 · 21 patents
- Shawcor Ltd. #14,251 · 21 patents
- Shedrain Corporation #14,252 · 21 patents
- Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd. #14,253 · 21 patents
- Shenzhen FLY Rodent Dynamics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. #14,254 · 21 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sharp's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Sharp, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Sharp ranks #851 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (37 here).
Sharp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2018 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2019 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2021 | 3 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2023 | 3 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 4.8% |
Which technologies does Sharp Fluidics Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Sharp Fluidics Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Sharp Fluidics Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #14,261 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Sharp Fluidics Inc. against Semantic Technologies PTY Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.