Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Shenzhen ranks #14,265 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #14,265
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (13.5/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- +10%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14265 · Foreign Corporation #14,265 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #14,265/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Shanghai Easy-use…
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 13.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +10% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Shenzhen’s 13.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Shenzhen
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Shenzhen Ennoplus… · this assignee 14
Shenzhen Ennoplus… · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Shenzhen's Innovation Score is 13.5/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shenzhen?
Each dot is one of Shenzhen’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shenzhen’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Shenzhen's grants concentrate
Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2019 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Shenzhen sits between Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd and Sichuan Sunfor Light Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen's three-year grant acceleration
Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 15 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Shenzhen's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Shanghai Easy-use…
Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd
21 patents
- Sharp Fluidics
Sharp Fluidics Inc.
21 patents
- Shawcor
Shawcor Ltd.
21 patents
- Shedrain
Shedrain Corporation
21 patents
- Shenzhen FLY Rode…
Shenzhen FLY Rodent Dynamics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Shenzhen Genorivi…
Shenzhen Genorivision Technology Co. Ltd.
21 patents
- Ship AND Ocean In…
Ship AND Ocean Industries R&dcenter
21 patents
- Sichuan Sunfor Li…
Sichuan Sunfor Light Co., Ltd
21 patents
- Shenzhen Ennoplus… ◀
Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd.
21 patents
What this shows Shenzhen holds 21 patents at rank #14,253, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Shenzhen
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,253 in granted patent volume.
- Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd #14,249 · 21 patents
- Sharp Fluidics Inc. #14,250 · 21 patents
- Shawcor Ltd. #14,251 · 21 patents
- Shedrain Corporation #14,252 · 21 patents
- Shenzhen FLY Rodent Dynamics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. #14,254 · 21 patents
- Shenzhen Genorivision Technology Co. Ltd. #14,255 · 21 patents
- Ship AND Ocean Industries R&dcenter #14,256 · 21 patents
- Sichuan Sunfor Light Co., Ltd #14,257 · 21 patents
Shenzhen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 4.8% |
| 2019 | 9 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2021 | 1 | 4.8% |
| 2022 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 4.8% |
| 2024 | 2 | 9.5% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #14,265 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Shenzhen Ennoplus Technology Co., Ltd. against Shanghai Easy-use Tools Enterprise Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 13.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.