Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 109 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #3,407 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 109 patents across 18 technology areas.
- #3,407
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 29%
- by Innovation Score (42.9/100)
- 13.1
- avg claims per patent
- +40%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R3407 · Foreign Corporation #3,407 · 109 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 109 grants
- TOP-DECILE #3,407/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Neuravi
- CPC-FOCUS A61P · 18 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +40% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Neuravi Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Shanghai’s 42.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Shanghai
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cognis IP Management · near
Cognis IP Management · near
43 score
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals… · near
Jazz Pharmaceuticals… · near
43 score
- Shanghai Institute… · this assignee
Shanghai Institute… · this assignee
43 score
- Skidata · near
Skidata · near
43 score
- Biomet Sports Medicine · near
Biomet Sports Medicine · near
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 42.9/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shanghai?
Each dot is one of Shanghai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shanghai’s own 13.1 claims/patent is at or below the 13.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Shanghai's grants concentrate
Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 93.6% of grants classified under A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (18 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2015. By volume, Shanghai sits between Neuravi Limited and SKYPE.
Shanghai's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences moved from 47 to 27 grants (0.57x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,513. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Shanghai's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Neuravi
Neuravi Limited
109 patents
- Nucor
Nucor Corporation
109 patents
- Progressive Inter…
Progressive International Corp.
109 patents
- Rittal & KG
Rittal GMBH & Co. KG
109 patents
- Siemens Product L…
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
109 patents
- SIG Technology
SIG Technology AG
109 patents
- Silgan Dispensing…
Silgan Dispensing Systems Corporation
109 patents
- Skype
SKYPE
109 patents
- Shanghai Institut… ◀
Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
109 patents
What this shows Shanghai holds 109 patents at rank #3,406, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Shanghai
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,406 in granted patent volume.
- Neuravi Limited #3,402 · 109 patents
- Nucor Corporation #3,403 · 109 patents
- Progressive International Corp. #3,404 · 109 patents
- Rittal GMBH & Co. KG #3,405 · 109 patents
- Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. #3,407 · 109 patents
- SIG Technology AG #3,408 · 109 patents
- Silgan Dispensing Systems Corporation #3,409 · 109 patents
- SKYPE #3,410 · 109 patents
Leaders in A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Me…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,387 in class
- Novartis AG 1,071 in class
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 889 in class
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 879 in class
- Genentech, Inc. 789 in class
- The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System 744 in class
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. 722 in class
- The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services 721 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shanghai, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Me…), Shanghai ranks #152 of 6,058 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (43 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (13.1 here).
Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 3.7% |
| 2016 | 8 | 7.3% |
| 2017 | 6 | 5.5% |
| 2018 | 9 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 15 | 13.8% |
| 2020 | 18 | 16.5% |
| 2021 | 14 | 12.8% |
| 2022 | 14 | 12.8% |
| 2023 | 6 | 5.5% |
| 2024 | 7 | 6.4% |
| 2025partial year | 8 | 7.3% |
Which technologies does Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences patent most?
Top 15 of 18 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's lead technology class is A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations), 93.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61P
- Ranked #3,407 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Shanghai Institute OF Materia Medica, Chinese Academy OF Sciences against Neuravi Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.