Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 39 granted patents across 36 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #8,284 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 39 patents across 36 technology areas.
- #8,284
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 16%
- by Innovation Score (48.7/100)
- 11.5
- avg claims per patent
- +43%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R8284 · Foreign Corporation #8,284 · 39 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 39 grants
- UPPER-Q #8,284/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rawles
- CPC-FOCUS C04B · 36 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +43% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rawles LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Shanghai’s 48.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Shanghai
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Digital Ally · near
Digital Ally · near
49 score
- National University… · near
National University… · near
49 score
- Shanghai Institute… · this assignee
Shanghai Institute… · this assignee
49 score
- Herakles · near
Herakles · near
49 score
- Kulite Semiconductor… · near
Kulite Semiconductor… · near
49 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 48.7/100 (top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shanghai?
Each dot is one of Shanghai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shanghai’s own 11.5 claims/patent is at or below the 14.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Shanghai's grants concentrate
Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences is a focused PatentsView assignee: 36 CPC subclasses with 38.5% of grants classified under C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Shanghai sits between Rawles LLC and Silicon Valley Bank.
Shanghai's three-year grant acceleration
Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences shows 14 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Shanghai's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rawles
Rawles LLC
39 patents
- Reliance Jio Info…
Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited
39 patents
- Roche Diagnostics…
Roche Diagnostics Hematology, Inc.
39 patents
- Shanghai Harvest…
Shanghai Harvest Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd
39 patents
- Shenyang Institut…
Shenyang Institute OF Automation, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
39 patents
- Shenzhen Bestqi I…
Shenzhen Bestqi Innovation Technology Co., Ltd
39 patents
- Silhouette Intern…
Silhouette International Schmied AG
39 patents
- Silicon Valley Ba…
Silicon Valley Bank
39 patents
- Shanghai Institut… ◀
Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
39 patents
What this shows Shanghai holds 39 patents at rank #8,279, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Shanghai
By rank, the assignees closest to #8,279 in granted patent volume.
- Rawles LLC #8,275 · 39 patents
- Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited #8,276 · 39 patents
- Roche Diagnostics Hematology, Inc. #8,277 · 39 patents
- Shanghai Harvest Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd #8,278 · 39 patents
- Shenyang Institute OF Automation, Chinese Academy OF Sciences #8,280 · 39 patents
- Shenzhen Bestqi Innovation Technology Co., Ltd #8,281 · 39 patents
- Silhouette International Schmied AG #8,282 · 39 patents
- Silicon Valley Bank #8,283 · 39 patents
Leaders in C04B (Lime)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.
- NGK Insulators, Ltd. 451 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 417 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 271 in class
- Corning Incorporated 262 in class
- TDK Corporation 164 in class
- Rolls-Royce Corporation 135 in class
- United States Gypsum Company 132 in class
- Mitsubishi Materials Corporation 129 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shanghai, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C04B (Lime), Shanghai ranks #92 of 1,052 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (49 here).
Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 5.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 2.6% |
| 2017 | 5 | 12.8% |
| 2019 | 6 | 15.4% |
| 2020 | 3 | 7.7% |
| 2021 | 3 | 7.7% |
| 2022 | 3 | 7.7% |
| 2023 | 6 | 15.4% |
| 2024 | 5 | 12.8% |
| 2025partial year | 5 | 12.8% |
Which technologies does Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences patent most?
Top 15 of 36 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's lead technology class is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone), 38.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C04B
- Ranked #8,284 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences against Rawles LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.