USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Shanghai Institute OF Ceramics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences

USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 39 granted patents across 36 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE).

39
Total patents granted
36
CPC technology areas
11.5
Avg claims per patent
+79%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Shanghai holds 39 US patents across 36 technology areas — rank #8,279 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#8,279
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 16%
by Innovation Score (48.7/100)
11.5
avg claims per patent
+79%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES has been granted 39 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES at rank #8,279 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 36 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE). As a Foreign Corporation, SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 48.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 25 grants, compared with 14 in the 2015–2019 window — a +79% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's 11.5 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 36 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does SHANGHAI compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows SHANGHAI holds 39 patents — placing it at rank #8,279 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

SHANGHAI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172019202020212022202320242025 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 5.1%
2016 1 2.6%
2017 5 12.8%
2019 6 15.4%
2020 3 7.7%
2021 3 7.7%
2022 3 7.7%
2023 6 15.4%
2024 5 12.8%
2025 5 12.8%

Which technologies does SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES patent most?

Top 15 of 36 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Simple
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#8,279

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView — US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES hold?
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES holds 39 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 36 technology areas.
What is SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's Innovation Score?
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES has an Innovation Score of 48.7 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES focus on?
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's top technology area is C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE) with 15 patents. The company has filed patents in 36 CPC subclasses total.
Is SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's recent filing velocity is +79% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's patents?
SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES's patents average 11.5 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Learn More

How to use this portfolio

Shanghai's 39 grants land it in the top 16% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — Shanghai ranks #8,279 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in C04B — see who else leads that technology area. C04B leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov