Scientific Games, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Scientific ranks #12,659 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #12,659
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 7%
- by Innovation Score (55.1/100)
- 17.9
- avg claims per patent
- +9%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12659 · US Corporation #12,659 · 24 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
- MID-PACK #12,659/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sanofi Pasteur
- CPC-FOCUS G07F · 14 areas
- INNOV-PAR 55.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +9% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sanofi Pasteur SA (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Scientific’s 55.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Scientific
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Scientific Games · this assignee
Scientific Games · this assignee
55 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Scientific's Innovation Score is 55.1/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Scientific?
Each dot is one of Scientific’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Scientific’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Scientific's grants concentrate
Scientific Games, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Scientific sits between System Ceramics S.P.A. and Sioux Steel Company.
Scientific's three-year grant acceleration
Scientific Games, LLC shows 12 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Scientific's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- System Ceramics S…
System Ceramics S.P.A.
24 patents
- Sanofi Pasteur
Sanofi Pasteur SA
24 patents
- Schawbel
Schawbel Technologies LLC
24 patents
- Scholle IPN IP BV
Scholle IPN IP BV
24 patents
- Se-kure Controls
Se-Kure Controls, Inc.
24 patents
- Shanghai XPT Tech…
Shanghai XPT Technology Limited
24 patents
- Silcotek
Silcotek Corp.
24 patents
- Sioux Steel
Sioux Steel Company
24 patents
- Scientific Games ◀
Scientific Games, LLC
24 patents
What this shows Scientific holds 24 patents at rank #12,680, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Scientific
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,680 in granted patent volume.
- System Ceramics S.P.A. #12,676 · 24 patents
- Sanofi Pasteur SA #12,677 · 24 patents
- Schawbel Technologies LLC #12,678 · 24 patents
- Scholle IPN IP BV #12,679 · 24 patents
- Se-Kure Controls, Inc. #12,681 · 24 patents
- Shanghai XPT Technology Limited #12,682 · 24 patents
- Silcotek Corp. #12,683 · 24 patents
- Sioux Steel Company #12,684 · 24 patents
Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Scientific's primary technology class.
Scientific's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
55 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 8.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 4.2% |
| 2022 | 4 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 8.3% |
| 2024 | 6 | 25.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 4.2% |
Which technologies does Scientific Games, LLC patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Scientific Games, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Scientific Games, LLC's lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
- Ranked #12,659 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Scientific Games, LLC against System Ceramics S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 55.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.