Where does Schenck RoTec GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Schenck RoTec GmbH ranks #11,066 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Schenck RoTec GmbH hold?

Schenck RoTec GmbH holds 28 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 28 technology areas.

What is Schenck RoTec GmbH's Innovation Score?

Schenck RoTec GmbH has an Innovation Score of 38.5 out of 100 (top 40% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Schenck RoTec GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Schenck RoTec GmbH's recent grant velocity is -35% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Schenck RoTec GmbH's patents?

Schenck RoTec GmbH's patents average 10.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Schenck RoTec GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Schenck RoTec GmbH

Q: What technology areas does Schenck RoTec GmbH focus on?

Schenck RoTec GmbH's top technology area is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 21 patents, ranking #43 of 1,420 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 28 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 28 granted patents across 28 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Schenck ranks #11,066 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 28 patents across 28 technology areas.

#11,066
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 40%
by Innovation Score (38.5/100): 10.4
avg claims per patent: -35%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11066 · Foreign Corporation #11,066 · 28 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 28 grants
UPPER-Q #11,066/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Samet Kalip Ve…
CPC-FOCUS G01M · 28 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.5/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -35% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic. A.S. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Schenck’s 38.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.6 pts (30%) Velocity 2.0 pts (5%) Breadth 18.7 pts (49%) Claim depth 6.2 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Arcelormittal France · near

39
Bloomberg Finance · near

39
Hankook Tire · near

39
Schenck RoTec · this assignee

39
QuickStep · near

39
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Schenck's Innovation Score is 38.5/100 (top 40% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Schenck?

Each dot is one of Schenck’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Schenck’s own 10.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Schenck vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Schenck's grants concentrate

Schenck RoTec GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 28 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Schenck sits between Stoneridge, Inc. and ShelterLogic Corp..

Schenck's three-year grant acceleration

Schenck RoTec GmbH shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Stoneridge

28
Synack

28
Samet Kalip Ve Ma…

28
Sargento Foods

28
Schoeller Allibert

28
Scientist of Fort…

28
Sequans Communica…

28
Shelterlogic

28
Schenck Rotec ◀

28

What this shows Schenck holds 28 patents at rank #11,076, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Schenck

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,076 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Schenck's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Schenck, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures), Schenck ranks #43 of 1,420 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (39 here).

Arcelormittal France 39 Bloomberg Finance L.P. 39 Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. 39 QuickStep Technologies LLC 39

Schenck's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 40% higher than 60% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Schenck RoTec GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	14.3%
2016	4	14.3%
2017	5	17.9%
2018	2	7.1%
2019	2	7.1%
2020	3	10.7%
2021	5	17.9%
2023	2	7.1%
2024	1	3.6%

Which technologies does Schenck RoTec GmbH patent most?

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 21

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 5

B23B - TURNING; Boring 4

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

B60C - Vehicle TYRES; Tyre INFLATION; Tyre CHANGING; Connecting Valves TO Inflatable Elastic Bodies IN GENERAL; Devices OR Arrangements Related TO Tyres 3

B60B - Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion 3

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 2

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 2

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 2

B60S - Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 2

B23Q - Details, Components, OR Accessories FOR Machine Tools, e.g. Arrangements FOR Copying OR Controlling ; Machine Tools IN General Characterised BY THE Construction OF Particular Details OR COMPONENTS; Combinations OR Associations OF Metal-working Machines, NOT Directed TO A Particular Result 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

F16H - Gearing 1

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 1

Top 15 of 28 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Schenck RoTec GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Schenck RoTec GmbH's lead technology class is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01M
Ranked #11,066 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Schenck RoTec GmbH against Stoneridge, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.