Where does ROE Visual Co Ltd rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ROE Visual Co Ltd ranks #11,413 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ROE Visual Co Ltd hold?

ROE Visual Co Ltd holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is ROE Visual Co Ltd's Innovation Score?

ROE Visual Co Ltd has an Innovation Score of 33.9 out of 100 (46th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ROE Visual Co Ltd focus on?

ROE Visual Co Ltd's top technology area is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals) with 6 patents, ranking #116 of 860 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is ROE Visual Co Ltd's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

ROE Visual Co Ltd's recent grant velocity is -20% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for ROE Visual Co Ltd's patents?

ROE Visual Co Ltd's patents average 6.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ROE Visual Co Ltd patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

ROE Visual Co Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, ROE ranks #11,413 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 18 technology areas.

#11,413
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 46th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.9/100): 6.2
avg claims per patent: -20%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11413 · Foreign Corporation #11,413 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,413/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Resilience Magnum IP
CPC-FOCUS G09F · 18 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -20% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Resilience Magnum IP, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How ROE’s 33.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (34%) Velocity 3.7 pts (11%) Breadth 15.0 pts (44%) Claim depth 3.7 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
A K Stamping · near

34
Screen Semiconductor… · near

34
ROE Visual · this assignee

34
III Holdings 4 · near

34
John Nicholas and… · near

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows ROE's Innovation Score is 33.9/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for ROE?

Each dot is one of ROE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ROE’s own 6.2 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

ROE vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where ROE's grants concentrate

ROE Visual Co Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 22.2% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, ROE sits between Resilience Magnum IP, LLC and Ruentex Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd..

ROE's three-year grant acceleration

ROE Visual Co Ltd shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Resilience Magnum…

27
Resinate Material…

27
Rinat Neuroscience

27
Robatech

27
Ronbow

27
Royal Melbourne I…

27
RTX A/S

27
Ruentex Engineeri…

27
ROE Visual ◀

27

What this shows ROE holds 27 patents at rank #11,403, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ROE

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,403 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09F (Displaying)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ROE's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for ROE, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G09F (Displaying), ROE ranks #116 of 860 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (34 here).

A.K. Stamping Company, Inc. 34 John Nicholas and Kristin Gross Trust 34 III Holdings 4, LLC 34 Screen Semiconductor Solutions Co., Ltd. 34

ROE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ROE Visual Co Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	4	14.8%
2018	9	33.3%
2019	2	7.4%
2020	4	14.8%
2021	3	11.1%
2022	4	14.8%
2023	1	3.7%

Which technologies does ROE Visual Co Ltd patent most?

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 6

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 6

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 3

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 2

F16H - Gearing 2

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 2

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

B23Q - Details, Components, OR Accessories FOR Machine Tools, e.g. Arrangements FOR Copying OR Controlling ; Machine Tools IN General Characterised BY THE Construction OF Particular Details OR COMPONENTS; Combinations OR Associations OF Metal-working Machines, NOT Directed TO A Particular Result 1

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ROE Visual Co Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ROE Visual Co Ltd's lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 22.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
Ranked #11,413 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ROE Visual Co Ltd against Resilience Magnum IP, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.