RKW SE
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, RKW ranks #37,258 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #37,258
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 14%
- by Innovation Score (49.8/100)
- 17.3
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37258 · Foreign Corporation #37,258 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,258/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ridley USA
- CPC-FOCUS B32B · 12 areas
- INNOV-PAR 49.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ridley USA Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How RKW’s 49.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around RKW
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RKW SE · this assignee
RKW SE · this assignee
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows RKW's Innovation Score is 49.8/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for RKW?
Each dot is one of RKW’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RKW’s own 17.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where RKW's grants concentrate
RKW SE is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, RKW sits between Ridley USA Inc. and Rosecroft Components, Inc..
RKW's three-year grant acceleration
RKW SE shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at RKW's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ridley USA
Ridley USA Inc.
7 patents
- Ripelocker
Ripelocker, LLC
7 patents
- Ripple Therapeuti…
Ripple Therapeutics Corporation
7 patents
- Rivertop Renewabl…
Rivertop Renewables, Inc.
7 patents
- RL Industry
RL Industry Company Ltd.
7 patents
- RMZ Development
RMZ Development LLC
7 patents
- Robert Bosch Star…
Robert Bosch Start-up Platform North America, LLC, Series 1
7 patents
- Rosecroft Compone…
Rosecroft Components, Inc.
7 patents
- RKW SE ◀
RKW SE
7 patents
What this shows RKW holds 7 patents at rank #37,180, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RKW
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,180 in granted patent volume.
- Ridley USA Inc. #37,176 · 7 patents
- Ripelocker, LLC #37,177 · 7 patents
- Ripple Therapeutics Corporation #37,178 · 7 patents
- Rivertop Renewables, Inc. #37,179 · 7 patents
- RL Industry Company Ltd. #37,181 · 7 patents
- RMZ Development LLC #37,182 · 7 patents
- Robert Bosch Start-up Platform North America, LLC, Series 1 #37,183 · 7 patents
- Rosecroft Components, Inc. #37,184 · 7 patents
Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RKW's primary technology class.
RKW's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does RKW SE patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RKW SE's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RKW SE's lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
- Ranked #37,258 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RKW SE against Ridley USA Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 49.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.