Where does Riverhawk Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Riverhawk Company ranks #37,256 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Riverhawk Company hold?

Riverhawk Company holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Riverhawk Company's Innovation Score?

Riverhawk Company has an Innovation Score of 50.8 out of 100 (top 12% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Riverhawk Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Riverhawk Company's recent grant velocity is -25% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Riverhawk Company's patents?

Riverhawk Company's patents average 26.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Riverhawk Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Riverhawk Company

Q: What technology areas does Riverhawk Company focus on?

Riverhawk Company's top technology area is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing) with 4 patents, ranking #339 of 2,095 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Riverhawk ranks #37,256 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.

#37,256
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (50.8/100): 26.9
avg claims per patent: -25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37256 · US Corporation #37,256 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #37,256/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Rich Holding
CPC-NARROW F16B · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 26.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -25% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rich Technologies Holding Company, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Riverhawk’s 50.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (14%) Velocity 20.0 pts (39%) Breadth 8.7 pts (17%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Open Space Labs · near

51
Saudi Aramco · near

51
Schneider & KG · near

51
Riverhawk · this assignee

51
Voxeljet · near

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Riverhawk's Innovation Score is 50.8/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Riverhawk?

Each dot is one of Riverhawk’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Riverhawk’s own 26.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 19.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Riverhawk vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Riverhawk's grants concentrate

Riverhawk Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Riverhawk sits between Rich Technologies Holding Company, LLC and Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees of the Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002.

Riverhawk's three-year grant acceleration

Riverhawk Company shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Rich Holding

7
Riken Vitamin

7
Riobel

7
River Front Servi…

7
Robbins

7
Robert Bosch Heal…

7
Robert Bosch Powe…

7
Robert T and Virg…

7
Riverhawk ◀

7

What this shows Riverhawk holds 7 patents at rank #37,250, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Riverhawk

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,250 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Riverhawk's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Riverhawk, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements…), Riverhawk ranks #339 of 2,095 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

Voxeljet AG 51 Open Space Labs, Inc. 51 Schneider GmbH & Co. KG 51 Saudi Aramco Technologies Company 51

Riverhawk's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Riverhawk Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	14.3%
2016	1	14.3%
2018	1	14.3%
2019	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2024	2	28.6%

Which technologies does Riverhawk Company patent most?

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 4

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 4

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 3

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 3

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 2

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Riverhawk Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Riverhawk Company's lead technology class is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16B
Ranked #37,256 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Riverhawk Company against Rich Technologies Holding Company, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.