Where does Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund ranks #42,676 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

Is Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's patents?

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's patents average 17.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund

Q: How is the Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y02T (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Richard ranks #42,676 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.

#42,676
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 36th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.0/100): 17.5
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42676 · US Corporation #42,676 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,676/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Rgenix
CPC-NARROW Y02T · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rgenix, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Richard’s 31.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (22%) Velocity 4.4 pts (14%) Breadth 9.4 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.5 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Richard H Sherratt… · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Richard's Innovation Score is 31.0/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Richard?

Each dot is one of Richard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Richard’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Richard vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Richard's grants concentrate

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under Y02T (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Richard sits between Rgenix, Inc. and Risi Stone Inc..

Richard's three-year grant acceleration

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Rgenix

6
Rheosense

6
Rhonda Enterprises

6
Rhythm Diagnostic…

6
Righthand Robotics

6
Rimack Holdings

6
Rimgard Sweden AB

6
Risi Stone

6
Richard H Sherrat… ◀

6

What this shows Richard holds 6 patents at rank #42,685, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Richard

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,685 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y02T (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transpo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Richard's primary technology class.

Richard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	16.7%
2020	1	16.7%
2021	2	33.3%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund patent most?

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 5

B60L - Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic Suspension OR Levitation FOR VEHICLES; Monitoring Operating Variables OF Electrically-propelled Vehicl 5

H01H - Electric SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; Emergency Protective Devices 3

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 3

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 3

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 2

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund's lead technology class is Y02T (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y02T
Ranked #42,676 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Richard H. Sherratt and Susan B. Sherratt Revocable Trust Fund against Rgenix, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.