Where does Restore Medical Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Restore Medical Ltd. ranks #42,646 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Restore Medical Ltd. hold?

Restore Medical Ltd. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Restore Medical Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Restore Medical Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 46.7 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Restore Medical Ltd. focus on?

Restore Medical Ltd.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 6 patents, ranking #2,680 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Restore Medical Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Restore Medical Ltd..

What does claim depth mean for Restore Medical Ltd.'s patents?

Restore Medical Ltd.'s patents average 25.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Restore Medical Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Restore Medical Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Restore ranks #42,646 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.

#42,646
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.7/100): 25.3
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42646 · Foreign Corporation #42,646 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,646/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Resonant Sciences
CPC-NARROW A61B · 2 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.7/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 25.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Resonant Sciences, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Restore’s 46.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (14%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 5.0 pts (11%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
NanoCav · near

47
Restore Medical · this assignee

47
Sanuwave · near

47
Scrona · near

47
Tela Bio · near

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Restore's Innovation Score is 46.7/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Restore?

Each dot is one of Restore’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Restore’s own 25.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Restore vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Restore's grants concentrate

Restore Medical Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Restore sits between Resonant Sciences, LLC and Retsch GmbH.

Restore's three-year grant acceleration

Restore Medical Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Resonant Sciences

6
Resource Fiber

6
Respinor AS

6
Restaurant Revolu…

6
Retail Inkjet Sol…

6
Retech Systems

6
Retrovascular

6
Retsch

6
Restore Medical ◀

6

What this shows Restore holds 6 patents at rank #42,667, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Restore

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,667 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Restore's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Restore, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Restore ranks #2,680 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).

Scrona AG 47 NanoCav, LLC 47 Tela Bio, Inc. 47 Sanuwave, Inc. 47

Restore's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Restore Medical Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	2	33.3%
2024	2	33.3%

Which technologies does Restore Medical Ltd. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 6

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 6

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Restore Medical Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Restore Medical Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #42,646 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Restore Medical Ltd. against Resonant Sciences, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.