Retsch GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Retsch ranks #42,651 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #42,651
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 13.0
- avg claims per patent
- +300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42651 · Foreign Corporation #42,651 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,651/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Restore Medical
- CPC-NARROW B02C · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Restore Medical Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Retsch’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Retsch
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Retsch · this assignee 28
Retsch · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Retsch's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Retsch?
Each dot is one of Retsch’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Retsch’s own 13.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Retsch's grants concentrate
Retsch GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain). By volume, Retsch sits between Restore Medical Ltd. and Revise Products LLC.
Retsch's three-year grant acceleration
Retsch GmbH shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Retsch's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Restore Medical
Restore Medical Ltd.
6 patents
- Retail Inkjet Sol…
Retail Inkjet Solutions, Inc.
6 patents
- Retech Systems
Retech Systems LLC
6 patents
- Retrovascular
Retrovascular, Inc.
6 patents
- Revmax Performance
RevMax Performance, LLC
6 patents
- Revelle Aesthetics
Revelle Aesthetics, Inc.
6 patents
- Revelution Techno…
Revelution Technology, LLC
6 patents
- Revise Products
Revise Products LLC
6 patents
- Retsch ◀
Retsch GmbH
6 patents
What this shows Retsch holds 6 patents at rank #42,671, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Retsch
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,671 in granted patent volume.
- Restore Medical Ltd. #42,667 · 6 patents
- Retail Inkjet Solutions, Inc. #42,668 · 6 patents
- Retech Systems LLC #42,669 · 6 patents
- Retrovascular, Inc. #42,670 · 6 patents
- RevMax Performance, LLC #42,672 · 6 patents
- Revelle Aesthetics, Inc. #42,673 · 6 patents
- Revelution Technology, LLC #42,674 · 6 patents
- Revise Products LLC #42,675 · 6 patents
Leaders in B02C (Crushing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Retsch's primary technology class.
Retsch's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Retsch GmbH patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Retsch GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Retsch GmbH's lead technology class is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B02C
- Ranked #42,651 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Retsch GmbH against Restore Medical Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.