USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Relationship Science LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Relationship ranks #25,074 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.

#25,074
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
32nd percentile
by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
26.8
avg claims per patent
-78%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25074 · US Corporation #25,074 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
  • MID-PACK #25,074/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Rectorseal
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 26.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -78% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rectorseal, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Relationship’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Relationship

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Relationship's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Relationship?

Each dot is one of Relationship’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Relationship’s own 26.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Relationship vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 10.910.91111.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Rectorseal, LLC - 11, 16.27RectorsealRedberry Systems, Inc. - 11, 24.73Redberry SystemsRedfin Corporation - 11, 17.91RedfinReel, Inc. - 11, 17.91ReelRemediation Products, Inc. - 11, 22.45Remediation Produ…Renault Trucks - 11, 20.55Renault TrucksRenew Medical Inc. - 11, 2.18Renew MedicalRentrak Corporation - 11, 20.36RentrakRelationship Science LLC - 11, 26.82Relationship Scie…
Relationship vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Relationship's grants concentrate

Relationship Science LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Relationship sits between Rectorseal, LLC and Rentrak Corporation.

Who files at Relationship's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Relationship holds 11 patents at rank #25,077, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Relationship

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,077 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Relationship's primary technology class.

Relationship's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2015201620172018201920202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Relationship Science LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 36.4%
2016 1 9.1%
2017 2 18.2%
2018 1 9.1%
2019 1 9.1%
2020 1 9.1%
2021 1 9.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Relationship Science LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Relationship Science LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #25,074 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Relationship Science LLC against Rectorseal, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.