Relationship Science LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Relationship ranks #25,074 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #25,074
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 32nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
- 26.8
- avg claims per patent
- -78%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R25074 · US Corporation #25,074 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #25,074/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rectorseal
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 26.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -78% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rectorseal, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Relationship’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Relationship
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Relationship Science · this assignee 30
Relationship Science · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Relationship's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Relationship?
Each dot is one of Relationship’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Relationship’s own 26.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Relationship's grants concentrate
Relationship Science LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Relationship sits between Rectorseal, LLC and Rentrak Corporation.
Who files at Relationship's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rectorseal
Rectorseal, LLC
11 patents
- Redberry Systems
Redberry Systems, Inc.
11 patents
- Redfin
Redfin Corporation
11 patents
- Reel
Reel, Inc.
11 patents
- Remediation Produ…
Remediation Products, Inc.
11 patents
- Renault Trucks
Renault Trucks
11 patents
- Renew Medical
Renew Medical Inc.
11 patents
- Rentrak
Rentrak Corporation
11 patents
- Relationship Scie… ◀
Relationship Science LLC
11 patents
What this shows Relationship holds 11 patents at rank #25,077, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Relationship
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,077 in granted patent volume.
- Rectorseal, LLC #25,073 · 11 patents
- Redberry Systems, Inc. #25,074 · 11 patents
- Redfin Corporation #25,075 · 11 patents
- Reel, Inc. #25,076 · 11 patents
- Remediation Products, Inc. #25,078 · 11 patents
- Renault Trucks #25,079 · 11 patents
- Renew Medical Inc. #25,080 · 11 patents
- Rentrak Corporation #25,081 · 11 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Relationship's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Relationship's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
Which technologies does Relationship Science LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Relationship Science LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Relationship Science LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #25,074 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Relationship Science LLC against Rectorseal, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.