Where does Rapt IP Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Rapt IP Limited ranks #11,401 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Rapt IP Limited hold?

Rapt IP Limited holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Rapt IP Limited's Innovation Score?

Rapt IP Limited has an Innovation Score of 32.6 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Rapt IP Limited focus on?

Rapt IP Limited's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 27 patents, ranking #1,618 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Rapt IP Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Rapt IP Limited's recent grant velocity is -83% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Rapt IP Limited's patents?

Rapt IP Limited's patents average 27.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Rapt IP Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Rapt IP Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Rapt ranks #11,401 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 3 technology areas.

#11,401
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.6/100): 27.6
avg claims per patent: -83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11401 · Foreign Corporation #11,401 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,401/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Racepoint Energy
CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 27.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -83% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Racepoint Energy, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Rapt’s 32.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (35%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (19%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (46%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Alligator Bioscience… · near

33
Axsun · near

33
Holt Sales and Service · near

33
Matrix Industries · near

33
Rapt IP · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Rapt's Innovation Score is 32.6/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rapt?

Each dot is one of Rapt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rapt’s own 27.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Rapt vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Rapt's grants concentrate

Rapt IP Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2016. By volume, Rapt sits between Royal Melbourne Institute OF Technology and Redpine Signals, Inc..

Royal Melbourne I…

27
RTX A/S

27
Ruentex Engineeri…

27
Racepoint Energy

27
Realsee (Beijing)…

27
Recurium IP Holdi…

27
Redzone Robotics

27
Redpine Signals

27
Rapt IP ◀

27

What this shows Rapt holds 27 patents at rank #11,409, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Rapt

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,409 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rapt's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Rapt, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Rapt ranks #1,618 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (33 here).

Axsun Technologies, Inc. 33 Alligator Bioscience AB 33 Matrix Industries, Inc. 33 Holt Sales and Service, LLC 33

Rapt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Rapt IP Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	6	22.2%
2016	3	11.1%
2017	5	18.5%
2018	6	22.2%
2019	3	11.1%
2020	4	14.8%

Which technologies does Rapt IP Limited patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 27

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 2

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Rapt IP Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Rapt IP Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #11,401 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Rapt IP Limited against Royal Melbourne Institute OF Technology, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.